Saddam Hussein
has been captured. He is an evil, evil, man and will finally pay for his crimes against the Iraqi people. They're saying he will be tried by the Iraqi's themselves. I hope this capture is a sign of good things for the future. Iraq is celebrating.
Too bad George W. Bush hasn't been captured too, because he is also an evil, evil, evil jerk. 
LOL. I just watched the news. Saddam Hussein has been living in a hole. He looked funny, too.
I don't see how his capture means anything, though. It's not like he could've really done much to "terrorize the people of Iraq" or nuclear USA or anything.
I don't see how his capture means anything, though. It's not like he could've really done much to "terrorize the people of Iraq" or nuclear USA or anything.
scratcher, think about the terrorist attacks, etc, he could have sent those terrorists while staying in his "hole"
But I just read that he didn't. 
I don't know, though. It's not like I've been doing research about this.
I don't know, though. It's not like I've been doing research about this.
He needed to be caught just for symbolic reasons. That is realy important! Only now can the Iraqi people realy start a new future.
too bad hussein WASNT behind any terrorist attacks. and when the so-called 'terrorist' try to suicide bomb the US troops in iraq... what do you call it if china tries to send 10,000 soldiers into our country and aim their guns at us???
i hate to break it to you, but china would kick our ass in a war
I assume that Josh means the U.S. Indeed, China would kick everybody's asses if they needed to. In fact, I believe it was their assassins that placeed that deadly pretzel in the vicinity of George "I can't even chew" Bush.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Get real! Not noway nohow. It would be the most disastrous thing ever to happen outside of the cataclysm when dinosaurs disappeared. Nuclear and atomic bombs going off?? They wouldn't do it and neither would we but if everybody agreed to fight without the bombs, we would kick butt. And if they used bombs, they and all of us would lose! No winners. The subject is a no brainer.
Deciding about the rules of war (like not using atom bombs when you have them) is the same as fighting a war in a football match. In a war you gotta use everything you have!!
BAd analogy.
In a football match, you don't keep back your best player until your losing, send him on, and wait while he breaks all their legs.
You have to use your best players from the start, and in war, the deadliest weapons are usually hidden.
If that didn't make sense, don't worry. I don't understand it either.
In a football match, you don't keep back your best player until your losing, send him on, and wait while he breaks all their legs.
You have to use your best players from the start, and in war, the deadliest weapons are usually hidden.
If that didn't make sense, don't worry. I don't understand it either.
