The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Bible Study

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 10th 2011, 06:00 AM
wizardb.gif
Kyle
Peasant He/Him Belgium
 
...why should we believe science - as I have said in the past -

MsDink, this is basically just you not being a scientist You're speaking about scientific matters as if they are guesses by the scientists and if they all guess the same thing it becomes fact. This is not how science works AT ALL. There are clear rules and methodologies before something is proven as fact. In your example of carbon dating, the remains that have been found not only match the scientific research and postulations, but also conform to history as proven by recovered documents and ancient writing. Are you saying those can also not be seen as a fact because they could have been secretly made up?

And I agree with Skull's assessment of the dinosaur problem. Man came after dinosaur, yet man was supposedly created together with the animals. So there's a huge issue right there, no matter how you look at it.