Reply to Re: Bible Study
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
People THOUGHT that the Earth was flat, AFAIK religion didn't tell them to think that. Thinking/believing something and then being proved wrong does not mean you were lying in the first place.
I'm sorry. I explained myself badly there. What I meant was that religion was lying to people. And there's no point in denying that. People knew, for example, that the Earth was round before religion changed this. Someone must have started the "world is flat" idea, and he was therefor lying, claiming it as a fact.
I'm not trying to prove that Creation is true. I'm trying (and failing ) to point out to you the huge flaws in what you're saying, which basically boils down to "religion is wrong because science is true".
I really don't have flaws in what I said. At least that I know. Everything I have pointed out has been scientifically proven. It's in fact the Bible that has flaws in it. I never said "religion is wrong because science is right". In fact, I believe in most stuff in religions. I just change it into a more scientific point of view. In my opinion some scientists try to prove religion wrong too much, and vice versa, when people should try to combine these things. I think people are allowed to believe in religious things that science hasn't proven otherwise, but I also think that religions should admit their mistakes, when proven wrong by science. Things in religions that can be confirmed by science are the only ones that should be thought as the "absolute truth".
I'm sorry. I explained myself badly there. What I meant was that religion was lying to people. And there's no point in denying that. People knew, for example, that the Earth was round before religion changed this. Someone must have started the "world is flat" idea, and he was therefor lying, claiming it as a fact.
I'm not trying to prove that Creation is true. I'm trying (and failing ) to point out to you the huge flaws in what you're saying, which basically boils down to "religion is wrong because science is true".
I really don't have flaws in what I said. At least that I know. Everything I have pointed out has been scientifically proven. It's in fact the Bible that has flaws in it. I never said "religion is wrong because science is right". In fact, I believe in most stuff in religions. I just change it into a more scientific point of view. In my opinion some scientists try to prove religion wrong too much, and vice versa, when people should try to combine these things. I think people are allowed to believe in religious things that science hasn't proven otherwise, but I also think that religions should admit their mistakes, when proven wrong by science. Things in religions that can be confirmed by science are the only ones that should be thought as the "absolute truth".
