FInally! results!
OK, some of you know that I have been working on a small program to convert batches of images to the dink palette. well, i finally completed my first test!!
THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
and
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
thanks...
: OK, some of you know that I have been working on a small program to convert batches of images to the dink palette. well, i finally completed my first test!!
: THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: and
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: thanks...
It looks like your thing maintains indexes... which is bad. Essentially, it is harder than it seems... you have to do nearest-color matching. So you have to figure out, say, that from the source bmp pallete index 00 matches pallete index F2 in the Dink pallete.
This is what Photoshop does: http://www.dinknetwork.com/screenshots/one2.bmp
Just curious... why are you doing this? I'm all for competition and everything, but DinkersPal was released over a month ago, and does the same thing
: THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: and
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: thanks...
It looks like your thing maintains indexes... which is bad. Essentially, it is harder than it seems... you have to do nearest-color matching. So you have to figure out, say, that from the source bmp pallete index 00 matches pallete index F2 in the Dink pallete.
This is what Photoshop does: http://www.dinknetwork.com/screenshots/one2.bmp
Just curious... why are you doing this? I'm all for competition and everything, but DinkersPal was released over a month ago, and does the same thing
: : OK, some of you know that I have been working on a small program to convert batches of images to the dink palette. well, i finally completed my first test!!
: : THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: : I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: : and
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: : maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: : thanks...
: It looks like your thing maintains indexes... which is bad. Essentially, it is harder than it seems... you have to do nearest-color matching. So you have to figure out, say, that from the source bmp pallete index 00 matches pallete index F2 in the Dink pallete.
: This is what Photoshop does: http://www.dinknetwork.com/screenshots/one2.bmp
: Just curious... why are you doing this? I'm all for competition and everything, but DinkersPal was released over a month ago, and does the same thing
mainly to learn the python imaging library. besides this MAY be usefull to people....maybe...
: : THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: : I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: : and
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: : maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: : thanks...
: It looks like your thing maintains indexes... which is bad. Essentially, it is harder than it seems... you have to do nearest-color matching. So you have to figure out, say, that from the source bmp pallete index 00 matches pallete index F2 in the Dink pallete.
: This is what Photoshop does: http://www.dinknetwork.com/screenshots/one2.bmp
: Just curious... why are you doing this? I'm all for competition and everything, but DinkersPal was released over a month ago, and does the same thing
mainly to learn the python imaging library. besides this MAY be usefull to people....maybe...
: mainly to learn the python imaging library. besides this MAY be usefull to people....maybe...
Actully this would come in very handy for me i've been looking for something like this for a long while now
: OK, some of you know that I have been working on a small program to convert batches of images to the dink palette. well, i finally completed my first test!!
: THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: and
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: thanks...
I converted the image using 3 different programs (PaintShop Pro 7, MGI PhotoSuite & an obscure program called 20/20). MGI wouldn't do the conversion! It still had the original image I used from Dink. Oh well. The results are on the web at these addresses:
http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
Hope this helps you!
: THe only problem is, i have no idea how the first resulkts compare with using adobe photoshop...
: I have _just_ converted the palette, no other operations at this stage. i could apply some enhancment filters, maybe a slight blur, and then a sharpen?? i don't know, please tell me what you think! the two pictures are:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one.bmp (the original file)
: and
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/one1.bmp (the converted image)
: maybe someone could download one.bmp and convert it with something else, and post it, so i can compare results??
: thanks...
I converted the image using 3 different programs (PaintShop Pro 7, MGI PhotoSuite & an obscure program called 20/20). MGI wouldn't do the conversion! It still had the original image I used from Dink. Oh well. The results are on the web at these addresses:
http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
Hope this helps you!
: : mainly to learn the python imaging library. besides this MAY be usefull to people....maybe...
: Actully this would come in very handy for me i've been looking for something like this for a long while now
really?? well, I'll take a closer look at conversion algorithms... I have the ability to look at each pixel individually, so i could allways try to make my own... you never know, i might even come up with something half way decent..
I'd love to know what dinkerspal is written in...
: Actully this would come in very handy for me i've been looking for something like this for a long while now
really?? well, I'll take a closer look at conversion algorithms... I have the ability to look at each pixel individually, so i could allways try to make my own... you never know, i might even come up with something half way decent..
I'd love to know what dinkerspal is written in...
: I converted the image using 3 different programs (PaintShop Pro 7, MGI PhotoSuite & an obscure program called 20/20). MGI wouldn't do the conversion! It still had the original image I used from Dink. Oh well. The results are on the web at these addresses:
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
: Hope this helps you!
20/20 didn't convert it at all... it is at least a 16-bit color bmp, and doesn't use the Dink pallete
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
: http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
: Hope this helps you!
20/20 didn't convert it at all... it is at least a 16-bit color bmp, and doesn't use the Dink pallete
: : I converted the image using 3 different programs (PaintShop Pro 7, MGI PhotoSuite & an obscure program called 20/20). MGI wouldn't do the conversion! It still had the original image I used from Dink. Oh well. The results are on the web at these addresses:
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
: : Hope this helps you!
: 20/20 didn't convert it at all... it is at least a 16-bit color bmp, and doesn't use the Dink pallete
My fault.
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/psp7.bmp
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/mgi.bmp <-- still the rock from Dink
: : http://www.footnook.com/dink/2020.bmp <-- did the best!
: : Hope this helps you!
: 20/20 didn't convert it at all... it is at least a 16-bit color bmp, and doesn't use the Dink pallete
My fault.
Just a small update:
i decided to make my own algorithm, by first reading the palette from the splash screen, and then doing the following, for each individual pixel in the file i was trying to convert:
I mapped the color of the pixel in a 3D space, using the RGB values, instead of XYZ. then i calculated the distance between that point, and every color in the palette mapped in the same way. The color from the palette which was the closest in this way replaced the pixel from the original file. The results??
some wierd s**t is going on... My images are really wierd, like all green and brown, So i think there has been a mistake in my algorithm, maybe the bit about calculating the distance between two points in a 3D space, but I'll have a play...
Does anyone know where i can find some detailed information about how some of the other algorithms out there work?? It's be very interesting to see if i could emulate them, and twek them for use with dink. Despite it's difficult maths, it's a fun problem to solve...
any ideas??
does this look right?
distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
i got that from my physics textbooks, but it doesnt seem to be working.
any feedback s most welcome...
i decided to make my own algorithm, by first reading the palette from the splash screen, and then doing the following, for each individual pixel in the file i was trying to convert:
I mapped the color of the pixel in a 3D space, using the RGB values, instead of XYZ. then i calculated the distance between that point, and every color in the palette mapped in the same way. The color from the palette which was the closest in this way replaced the pixel from the original file. The results??
some wierd s**t is going on... My images are really wierd, like all green and brown, So i think there has been a mistake in my algorithm, maybe the bit about calculating the distance between two points in a 3D space, but I'll have a play...
Does anyone know where i can find some detailed information about how some of the other algorithms out there work?? It's be very interesting to see if i could emulate them, and twek them for use with dink. Despite it's difficult maths, it's a fun problem to solve...
any ideas??
does this look right?
distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
i got that from my physics textbooks, but it doesnt seem to be working.
any feedback s most welcome...
OMG!! we've all been duped!! I just ran a small count on the number of colors in the splash screen, guess how many:
174!!
WTF is going on here??
i also tried the editor splash screen, and that has 233 colors on it... hmmmmmmmm..
my suspicions are deepened by the fact that there don't seem to be any bright reds in the splash screen. Now I'm really confused.. any ideas??
174!!
WTF is going on here??
i also tried the editor splash screen, and that has 233 colors on it... hmmmmmmmm..
my suspicions are deepened by the fact that there don't seem to be any bright reds in the splash screen. Now I'm really confused.. any ideas??
: OMG!! we've all been duped!! I just ran a small count on the number of colors in the splash screen, guess how many:
: 174!!
: WTF is going on here??
: i also tried the editor splash screen, and that has 233 colors on it... hmmmmmmmm..
: my suspicions are deepened by the fact that there don't seem to be any bright reds in the splash screen. Now I'm really confused.. any ideas??
You must be doing something really, really, really wrong.
True, esplash.bmp has some issues... but splash.bmp and the rest of the tiles should be fine.
You do know how the 256 color bmp file format is done, right? The first 54 bytes control the header of it, which has such fun things as the file size, dimensions, etc. in it.
Then the next 1024 bytes is the pallete... each pallete entry takes up 4 bytes, one for red, one for green, one for blue, and a blank byte.
Then after that, the bmp stores the lowest line of the bmp, referencing the color in the pallete with a simple byte.
All of that was done by the wonders of reverse engineering a while ago... but I'm sure there are much more detailed explanations around the web.
I'm not sure what you're doing... but splash.bmp definately has a 256 color pallete. It might not use all of the colors in it... but it is still there.
: 174!!
: WTF is going on here??
: i also tried the editor splash screen, and that has 233 colors on it... hmmmmmmmm..
: my suspicions are deepened by the fact that there don't seem to be any bright reds in the splash screen. Now I'm really confused.. any ideas??
You must be doing something really, really, really wrong.
True, esplash.bmp has some issues... but splash.bmp and the rest of the tiles should be fine.
You do know how the 256 color bmp file format is done, right? The first 54 bytes control the header of it, which has such fun things as the file size, dimensions, etc. in it.
Then the next 1024 bytes is the pallete... each pallete entry takes up 4 bytes, one for red, one for green, one for blue, and a blank byte.
Then after that, the bmp stores the lowest line of the bmp, referencing the color in the pallete with a simple byte.
All of that was done by the wonders of reverse engineering a while ago... but I'm sure there are much more detailed explanations around the web.
I'm not sure what you're doing... but splash.bmp definately has a 256 color pallete. It might not use all of the colors in it... but it is still there.
: does this look right?
: distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: : does this look right?
: : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
: : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
: : : does this look right?
: : : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: : I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
: And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
I just checked esplash.bmp, and it has the same exact pallete as splash.bmp...
But, in reality, the Python imaging library is probably correct... I think you're wrong
I'm guessing you're calling the function to count the colors in the image... neither splash.bmp or esplash.bmp use all 256 colors in the pallete, so you would never get 256 as a return value.
As for the bmp pallete in raw format... just use a hex editor and tada. It isn't too hard
: : : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: : I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
: And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
I just checked esplash.bmp, and it has the same exact pallete as splash.bmp...
But, in reality, the Python imaging library is probably correct... I think you're wrong
I'm guessing you're calling the function to count the colors in the image... neither splash.bmp or esplash.bmp use all 256 colors in the pallete, so you would never get 256 as a return value.As for the bmp pallete in raw format... just use a hex editor and tada. It isn't too hard
: : : does this look right?
: : : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: : I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
: And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
Here's the pelette file generated by PSP. It's RGB
JASC-PAL
0100
256
255 255 255
255 255 202
255 255 2
255 247 148
255 231 165
255 231 115
255 222 148
255 206 107
255 198 255
255 189 82
255 181 49
255 179 179
255 156 74
255 140 57
255 140 24
255 132 132
255 125 0
255 107 45
255 64 64
255 0 0
251 69 0
247 255 148
247 214 107
247 206 173
247 189 107
247 173 115
239 222 123
231 206 90
231 189 156
231 49 4
222 222 222
222 198 99
222 189 165
222 173 255
222 173 90
215 200 200
214 239 115
214 231 181
214 206 115
214 165 132
214 148 66
206 184 132
206 181 181
206 181 95
206 115 49
206 107 231
198 222 107
198 165 140
198 165 82
198 148 255
198 140 82
198 49 8
198 33 0
189 206 165
189 181 165
189 173 99
189 173 74
189 123 82
187 208 82
181 231 255
181 189 206
181 156 148
181 156 74
181 148 115
181 132 255
181 119 62
179 0 0
177 103 37
173 189 140
173 181 189
173 173 148
173 165 123
173 107 57
169 218 231
169 140 29
167 167 167
165 189 198
165 173 74
165 156 90
165 156 74
165 148 66
165 140 62
165 115 247
165 115 82
165 82 24
165 49 16
165 8 8
156 206 255
156 173 115
156 148 123
156 148 107
156 140 99
156 90 41
153 213 227
148 198 255
148 181 189
148 173 49
148 132 115
140 189 255
140 173 231
140 165 123
140 156 107
140 132 140
140 132 99
140 123 57
140 115 82
140 115 66
140 90 57
140 82 33
140 49 165
132 181 74
132 156 132
132 152 169
132 115 16
132 90 206
132 82 222
132 0 0
129 66 20
125 0 255
123 140 49
123 132 99
123 123 107
123 115 49
123 107 41
123 82 189
123 82 41
123 74 198
123 24 148
115 173 255
115 165 173
115 148 148
115 148 90
115 132 16
115 115 90
115 107 115
115 99 148
115 99 66
115 90 74
115 82 57
115 74 189
115 66 33
115 41 41
115 16 16
111 152 169
111 111 111
107 148 74
107 123 132
107 107 99
107 107 74
107 107 66
107 49 49
103 136 136
99 222 247
99 156 231
99 148 49
99 132 140
99 132 74
99 123 82
99 107 41
99 90 82
99 66 41
99 57 165
99 8 123
90 123 49
90 107 115
90 107 8
90 99 123
90 99 49
90 90 198
90 90 66
90 82 66
90 82 33
90 74 57
90 49 8
90 8 8
90 0 0
82 140 222
82 123 181
82 115 156
82 115 123
82 115 66
82 107 115
82 90 0
82 74 132
82 45 29
82 33 0
78 103 49
74 115 189
74 99 57
74 90 123
74 90 49
74 82 57
74 74 33
74 66 41
74 49 123
74 41 90
74 0 99
73 89 106
71 100 106
70 95 103
70 86 37
66 107 165
66 107 156
66 103 140
66 8 8
62 70 37
57 99 24
57 82 82
57 66 0
57 57 37
57 49 24
57 41 107
57 33 16
57 24 82
57 24 0
55 55 55
49 90 140
49 74 74
49 74 41
49 74 24
49 66 24
49 57 66
49 41 24
49 0 0
45 90 132
41 90 132
41 74 115
41 57 90
41 57 66
41 49 57
41 0 49
37 70 115
37 53 20
33 156 181
33 57 82
33 41 16
33 33 99
33 33 24
33 24 57
33 24 16
26 1 33
24 132 156
24 74 132
24 41 49
24 16 8
20 28 4
16 90 115
16 57 99
16 49 90
16 0 0
8 16 0
8 8 66
0 255 0
0 44 77
0 0 255
0 0 0
If that doesn't help I could also send you a bmp that really does use all the colors.
: : : distance between any two points = sqrt((x-x1)^2 * (y-y1)^2 * (z-z1)^2)
: : I'm not sure if your algorithm would work, but your equation is wrong (or at least you typed it wrong). Distance between any two points should be sqrt((x-x1)^2 + (y-y1)^2 + (z-z1)^2).
: Ahuh!! thats where i was going wrong...
: And redink, i trusted the python imaging library... does anyone have a list of colors in RGB format which the palette allows?? i need them in raw format, see?
Here's the pelette file generated by PSP. It's RGB
JASC-PAL
0100
256
255 255 255
255 255 202
255 255 2
255 247 148
255 231 165
255 231 115
255 222 148
255 206 107
255 198 255
255 189 82
255 181 49
255 179 179
255 156 74
255 140 57
255 140 24
255 132 132
255 125 0
255 107 45
255 64 64
255 0 0
251 69 0
247 255 148
247 214 107
247 206 173
247 189 107
247 173 115
239 222 123
231 206 90
231 189 156
231 49 4
222 222 222
222 198 99
222 189 165
222 173 255
222 173 90
215 200 200
214 239 115
214 231 181
214 206 115
214 165 132
214 148 66
206 184 132
206 181 181
206 181 95
206 115 49
206 107 231
198 222 107
198 165 140
198 165 82
198 148 255
198 140 82
198 49 8
198 33 0
189 206 165
189 181 165
189 173 99
189 173 74
189 123 82
187 208 82
181 231 255
181 189 206
181 156 148
181 156 74
181 148 115
181 132 255
181 119 62
179 0 0
177 103 37
173 189 140
173 181 189
173 173 148
173 165 123
173 107 57
169 218 231
169 140 29
167 167 167
165 189 198
165 173 74
165 156 90
165 156 74
165 148 66
165 140 62
165 115 247
165 115 82
165 82 24
165 49 16
165 8 8
156 206 255
156 173 115
156 148 123
156 148 107
156 140 99
156 90 41
153 213 227
148 198 255
148 181 189
148 173 49
148 132 115
140 189 255
140 173 231
140 165 123
140 156 107
140 132 140
140 132 99
140 123 57
140 115 82
140 115 66
140 90 57
140 82 33
140 49 165
132 181 74
132 156 132
132 152 169
132 115 16
132 90 206
132 82 222
132 0 0
129 66 20
125 0 255
123 140 49
123 132 99
123 123 107
123 115 49
123 107 41
123 82 189
123 82 41
123 74 198
123 24 148
115 173 255
115 165 173
115 148 148
115 148 90
115 132 16
115 115 90
115 107 115
115 99 148
115 99 66
115 90 74
115 82 57
115 74 189
115 66 33
115 41 41
115 16 16
111 152 169
111 111 111
107 148 74
107 123 132
107 107 99
107 107 74
107 107 66
107 49 49
103 136 136
99 222 247
99 156 231
99 148 49
99 132 140
99 132 74
99 123 82
99 107 41
99 90 82
99 66 41
99 57 165
99 8 123
90 123 49
90 107 115
90 107 8
90 99 123
90 99 49
90 90 198
90 90 66
90 82 66
90 82 33
90 74 57
90 49 8
90 8 8
90 0 0
82 140 222
82 123 181
82 115 156
82 115 123
82 115 66
82 107 115
82 90 0
82 74 132
82 45 29
82 33 0
78 103 49
74 115 189
74 99 57
74 90 123
74 90 49
74 82 57
74 74 33
74 66 41
74 49 123
74 41 90
74 0 99
73 89 106
71 100 106
70 95 103
70 86 37
66 107 165
66 107 156
66 103 140
66 8 8
62 70 37
57 99 24
57 82 82
57 66 0
57 57 37
57 49 24
57 41 107
57 33 16
57 24 82
57 24 0
55 55 55
49 90 140
49 74 74
49 74 41
49 74 24
49 66 24
49 57 66
49 41 24
49 0 0
45 90 132
41 90 132
41 74 115
41 57 90
41 57 66
41 49 57
41 0 49
37 70 115
37 53 20
33 156 181
33 57 82
33 41 16
33 33 99
33 33 24
33 24 57
33 24 16
26 1 33
24 132 156
24 74 132
24 41 49
24 16 8
20 28 4
16 90 115
16 57 99
16 49 90
16 0 0
8 16 0
8 8 66
0 255 0
0 44 77
0 0 255
0 0 0
If that doesn't help I could also send you a bmp that really does use all the colors.
: If that doesn't help I could also send you a bmp that really does use all the colors.
wow! you'rew a god!!
thanks for that, but yes please, could you send me that image, I'd be most appreciative, and I'll put both you're names in the credits. I have to get this part working, and then build a GUI around it, and then tweak my algorithm to give me the best results, then guess I'll release it... I may even get it made into an official debian package... Not that I'm supposed to talk about LINUX here..
ok, cancel that, i got it sorted out anyways
whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
: ok, cancel that, i got it sorted out anyways
: whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
: whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
: : ok, cancel that, i got it sorted out anyways
: : whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: : Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
: You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
thats easy enough to fix. i just change the line:
im.save('%s-converted.bmp','RGB')
to:
im.save(%s-converted.bmp','P')
how does it compare with photoshop? i could tweak it a little...
: : whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: : Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
: You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
thats easy enough to fix. i just change the line:
im.save('%s-converted.bmp','RGB')
to:
im.save(%s-converted.bmp','P')
how does it compare with photoshop? i could tweak it a little...
