Reply to Re: FInally! results! - Here Ya' Go
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
: : ok, cancel that, i got it sorted out anyways 
: : whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: : Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
: You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
thats easy enough to fix. i just change the line:
im.save('%s-converted.bmp','RGB')
to:
im.save(%s-converted.bmp','P')
how does it compare with photoshop? i could tweak it a little...
: : whats more, the results are really good! here are some URL's to compare them. could someone do the photoshop thing, and see what the difference is?:
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test.jpg <original
: : http://thomi.imail.net.nz/other/test-converted.bmp
: : Now even if i say so myself, that is some pretty good results. haven't actually tested it in dink yet, see my other current forum thread
: You seemed to have succeeded in reducing the colors to the Dink Pallete... but its still a 24-bit color bmp, not a 256 color pallete-ized one.
thats easy enough to fix. i just change the line:
im.save('%s-converted.bmp','RGB')
to:
im.save(%s-converted.bmp','P')
how does it compare with photoshop? i could tweak it a little...
