Reply to Re: Bible Study
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Now, now.
And remember what happened to the "fact" that Earth is flat? I think you just kinda talked yourself in a corner there.
Heh, yeah maybe
Religion caused people to LIE that the Earth was flat. Science proved it otherwise.
People THOUGHT that the Earth was flat, AFAIK religion didn't tell them to think that. Thinking/believing something and then being proved wrong does not mean you were lying in the first place.
It is straightforward. Religion has just messed up peoples' heads so bad that they see things that aren't there, and completely disregard facts, cause they're too afraid they have been wrong all this time.
I have given you plenty of proof. I'll consider that the Creation is true if you give me the smallest of evidence that I can't explain otherwise. I know you can explain my proof otherwise too, but the difference is you're making things up while I'm sticking with facts.
I'm not trying to prove that Creation is true. I'm trying (and failing ) to point out to you the huge flaws in what you're saying, which basically boils down to "religion is wrong because science is true".
And as for "the difference is you're making things up while I'm sticking with facts" well that's just silly. My example maybe, but not the argument as a whole.
And remember what happened to the "fact" that Earth is flat? I think you just kinda talked yourself in a corner there.
Heh, yeah maybe
Religion caused people to LIE that the Earth was flat. Science proved it otherwise.
People THOUGHT that the Earth was flat, AFAIK religion didn't tell them to think that. Thinking/believing something and then being proved wrong does not mean you were lying in the first place.
It is straightforward. Religion has just messed up peoples' heads so bad that they see things that aren't there, and completely disregard facts, cause they're too afraid they have been wrong all this time.
I have given you plenty of proof. I'll consider that the Creation is true if you give me the smallest of evidence that I can't explain otherwise. I know you can explain my proof otherwise too, but the difference is you're making things up while I'm sticking with facts.
I'm not trying to prove that Creation is true. I'm trying (and failing
) to point out to you the huge flaws in what you're saying, which basically boils down to "religion is wrong because science is true".And as for "the difference is you're making things up while I'm sticking with facts" well that's just silly. My example maybe, but not the argument as a whole.
