The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Bible Study

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 9th 2011, 09:27 AM
dinkdead.gif
"I'm not saying God didn't exist, but his first appearance in our history came much after various other religious beliefs, which doesn't make any sense according to the Bible, because there would have been existence before his appearance."

Who said He didn't exist before being documented?
The first appearance in our history being the Bible? That would make the first appearance either before Creation, or failing that, probably Abraham, who was the first to recognise God properly I suppose (after Adam, Noah etc). Or maybe you mean Moses, who wrote it down. None of which mean God didn't exist beforehand.

"He is also said to create existence in six days, even though days were made up by humans themselves and is based on astronomy, so there couldn't possibly be days before there was existence, because before existence there couldn't have been space nor humans"

Well if He created existence, He created time at the same moment, no? Time doesn't need humans to exist.

"... because after Earth was created, there weren't lions and tigers and elephants, for example."

What? Of course there were, if you believe in Creation. You can't bring a proof against one belief from another belief. It's like saying "Creation is wrong, because Evolution is right". Whatever the facts are, the argument is completely flawed