The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Bible Study

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 9th 2011, 04:27 AM
custom_skull.gif
Skull
Peasant He/Him Finland bloop
A Disembodied Sod 
That actually makes perfect sense. The Creation part of the Bible, I'm going as far as saying it's completely made up by humans. I'm not saying God didn't exist, but his first appearance in our history came much after various other religious beliefs, which doesn't make any sense according to the Bible, because there would have been existence before his appearance. This is just the Creation, not the rest. Most of the other stuff could very well be true. But not the Creation.

There is just so much wrong in it. The first one I've already stated; there was existence before he first came. He is also said to create existence in six days, even though days were made up by humans themselves and is based on astronomy, so there couldn't possibly be days before there was existence, because before existence there couldn't have been space nor humans, so there couldn't have been astronomy and anyone explaining astronomy. It also says God created all the modern animals right after he created Earth, but we know that can't be possible, because after Earth was created, there weren't lions and tigers and elephants, for example. Where did everything from inbetween go?! I could believe that maybe he came here at some point, and created modern animals, but not right after he created Earth. That would take out most of the stupid Creation. Really, it's the stupidest crap in the Bible.

The more you take everything in religions literally, and the more you try to explain them the "religious" or "magical" way, the more you will hit into a brick wall.