Reply to Temporal Nullification, should it be my new tag?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
edit edit:close this thread
This is an intelligent debate on concepts no one can understand but can make complex guesses about. This promotes thinking and therefore should not be closed but instead sink back into the archives after we get bored and argue about something else.
If you don't care for a thread (and you're not with the majority) then just ignore it and don't read it.
On to my theory.
After reading all of the theories and holes in the theories I have come up with one conclusion: Time is an illusion. Our brains only rationalize the passage of time as the alternative was incomprehensible back when spears with stone tips were at the top of technology. There was no beginning and no real end, there was never a time when god/allah/big-bang came before.
Clocks and other objects don't disprove this theory, as we designed them to "work" to our rationalized view of "time". There is no way to detect this true temporal nullification as our machines are designed to work on the terms of "time" and even if they weren't then we still could not comprehend it on our terms of "time".
The closest anyone is to getting toward this theory is with the concepts of god/allah having "a billion years in one day" or "one day is actually a year, and one year is actually a day". This is likely a result of the best possible description on our terms of "time" of what appears to be the true functioning of the universe.
To disprove the concept of time, take a look at black holes, or any gravity well. If time is simply the progression of events and is always a constant, then it should not be slowed and constrained by even the most intense gravity fields in the universe. Yet, we have managed to find extremely small differences in the speed of time at different altitudes above the earth. So our concept of time is in fact not a mechanism the universe runs on, but a byproduct of humans having to recognize something else as "time" and adjust their perception so that it was as good as true.
This is an intelligent debate on concepts no one can understand but can make complex guesses about. This promotes thinking and therefore should not be closed but instead sink back into the archives after we get bored and argue about something else.
If you don't care for a thread (and you're not with the majority) then just ignore it and don't read it.
On to my theory.
After reading all of the theories and holes in the theories I have come up with one conclusion: Time is an illusion. Our brains only rationalize the passage of time as the alternative was incomprehensible back when spears with stone tips were at the top of technology. There was no beginning and no real end, there was never a time when god/allah/big-bang came before.
Clocks and other objects don't disprove this theory, as we designed them to "work" to our rationalized view of "time". There is no way to detect this true temporal nullification as our machines are designed to work on the terms of "time" and even if they weren't then we still could not comprehend it on our terms of "time".
The closest anyone is to getting toward this theory is with the concepts of god/allah having "a billion years in one day" or "one day is actually a year, and one year is actually a day". This is likely a result of the best possible description on our terms of "time" of what appears to be the true functioning of the universe.
To disprove the concept of time, take a look at black holes, or any gravity well. If time is simply the progression of events and is always a constant, then it should not be slowed and constrained by even the most intense gravity fields in the universe. Yet, we have managed to find extremely small differences in the speed of time at different altitudes above the earth. So our concept of time is in fact not a mechanism the universe runs on, but a byproduct of humans having to recognize something else as "time" and adjust their perception so that it was as good as true.
