The Dink Network

Reply to Reviews

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
October 8th 2005, 03:04 PM
spike.gif
kikki
Peasant He/Him United Kingdom
This place has changed :) 
What exactly is the standard of the reviews these days? In previous years it was deemed a challenge to write a meaningful and thorough review, but it seems this attention to actually REVIEWING has lapsed in recent months. One in particular caught my eye..

"8.5 - Good September 20th, 2005
You guys are right.. Some of my songs are pretty repetive..
But in my opinion some of the songs could fit well in dink smallwood.

Im coming out with another midi pack on saturday.. It will also contain 12 midi files."

The standard of reviews has decreased immensely, and I dare even call this a review. A review is supposed to fully analyse good and bad points of files or downloads in order for a user (that doesn't enjoy downloading everything on a website) to have some idea as to whether or not he/she would like to download that file/download. This particular "review" has actually one setence of anything remotely helpful in a review (the rest is an advertisement for future a future download) and this is but one example.

This is not a rant, or an insult of this review in particular. But I think perhaps in the future the standard should be raised just a notch. Put some effort in dinkers! Debate!