Reply to Re: Dink Network - Site Upgrade Planning
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
1) Well, yeah, they kind of lost much of their meaning. Many demos got to the route where Unfinished category would make more sense. I guess I would support the reevaluation route, because while they have problems, they are part of the site's heritage.
2) Why not?
3) Urk... this. I know the review system has it's flaws, but scrapping something more than 10 years old that I also got used to would be going too far.
4) I don't like that the general compatibility of D-Mods got to the point where we no longer have them fully compatible with a single version. But this change may be necessery at this point...
5) Good idea, though I and maybe others would like to see the possible new design for this.
6) Why not?
7) Interesting change - why not?
8) Good.
9) Yes, this would be preferrable for me.
2) Why not?
3) Urk... this. I know the review system has it's flaws, but scrapping something more than 10 years old that I also got used to would be going too far.
4) I don't like that the general compatibility of D-Mods got to the point where we no longer have them fully compatible with a single version. But this change may be necessery at this point...
5) Good idea, though I and maybe others would like to see the possible new design for this.
6) Why not?
7) Interesting change - why not?
8) Good.
9) Yes, this would be preferrable for me.
