Reply to Re: Why was my Historical Hero review refused I said it was good
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Let's see...
Even though I hate Skull this is fairly decent D-mod
That's certainly a reasonable review title, and it helps stay focused on what really matters: your opinion of the author.
Where to start Ok...
Yes, this is indeed the start of your review. Establishing that fact is necessary, otherwise the reader might be confused and think they're starting be reading the end of your review.
Postives
Your courage in using alternative spelling of common words is heartening.
-The simple fact of only epic to come out since 2005 until the sequel
The quality of a D-Mod is definitely defined by the year it was released.
-The name easy to remember
Why, just the other day I was down at the Soda Fountain Shoppe, and I was regaling the ol' chaps about D-Mods, and I found it quite handy to remember their simple names.
-It pokes fun at Necromancer never coming out
I remember playing Necromancer quite a while ago - wait, did I never upload it? I should get around to doing that someday.
Negatives
I am very discouraged that you decided to go back towards traditional spelling, as if you were pressured by a secret world order (shhhh).
-It suffers from a lack on identity trying to be like CC2
I agree, creating a D-Mod trying to be like one of the best D-Mods is downright shameful.
-Seth as the last boss .....(Yawn) been there done that
And I bet it had enemies like pillbugs (Yawn), boncas (Yawn), and maybe even a slayer or two (Yawn Yawn).
-Zeddexx and ExDeathevn get cameo roles but I dont How the hell do they deserve cameo roles?
All D-Mods, nay, all works of art, should be judged on whether the reviewer has received a cameo role.
-Map feels a little empty
Indeed.
-Bad spelling/grammer
Oh, ThePunisher, this sentence-fragment is the sweetest flavor of irony I have ever tasted. Yum. Thank you.
Title
Even though I hate Skull this is fairly decent D-mod
That's certainly a reasonable review title, and it helps stay focused on what really matters: your opinion of the author.
Review
Where to start Ok...
Yes, this is indeed the start of your review. Establishing that fact is necessary, otherwise the reader might be confused and think they're starting be reading the end of your review.
Postives
Your courage in using alternative spelling of common words is heartening.
-The simple fact of only epic to come out since 2005 until the sequel
The quality of a D-Mod is definitely defined by the year it was released.
-The name easy to remember
Why, just the other day I was down at the Soda Fountain Shoppe, and I was regaling the ol' chaps about D-Mods, and I found it quite handy to remember their simple names.
-It pokes fun at Necromancer never coming out
I remember playing Necromancer quite a while ago - wait, did I never upload it? I should get around to doing that someday.
Negatives
I am very discouraged that you decided to go back towards traditional spelling, as if you were pressured by a secret world order (shhhh).
-It suffers from a lack on identity trying to be like CC2
I agree, creating a D-Mod trying to be like one of the best D-Mods is downright shameful.
-Seth as the last boss .....(Yawn) been there done that
And I bet it had enemies like pillbugs (Yawn), boncas (Yawn), and maybe even a slayer or two (Yawn Yawn).
-Zeddexx and ExDeathevn get cameo roles but I dont How the hell do they deserve cameo roles?
All D-Mods, nay, all works of art, should be judged on whether the reviewer has received a cameo role.
-Map feels a little empty
Indeed.
-Bad spelling/grammer
Oh, ThePunisher, this sentence-fragment is the sweetest flavor of irony I have ever tasted. Yum. Thank you.
