Reply to Re: Dink with Lua scripting
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Awesome. I can't wait.
> The problem, of course, is that hardly anybody's going to mess around with a "fork" of Dink. I think this is a great idea, but I'm also pretty sure people are going to stick to the main version.
I would contest that. Look at how many people still use Aural+, and how often Dink 1.09 is derided. Even so, we'll be a good audience for messing around with it.
> The problem, of course, is that hardly anybody's going to mess around with a "fork" of Dink. I think this is a great idea, but I'm also pretty sure people are going to stick to the main version.
I would contest that. Look at how many people still use Aural+, and how often Dink 1.09 is derided. Even so, we'll be a good audience for messing around with it.
