Reply to Re: This is gunna come back and bite me...
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Scientific data says we exist, while we may not exist at all.
That is philosophy, not science.
What you call science should be called human point of view.
Modern science is based on sound and reasonable principles. Although some research isn't done properly, the method as a whole outperforms an arbitrary "human point of view".
Why are you acting like you know everything, running boy? So far I haven't heard a single "proof" from you on the actual subject, except for human point of view. I myself have given you plenty of proof.
I don't think you know what the word "proof" means. Even many students have difficulty providing a "proof". Handwaving and arguments are not proof. Only a rigorous explanation can be a proof.
Science is all about trying to explain things human brain can't understand, so everyone who's involved in trying to explain science, only make themselves look dumb. *Cough*Scientistsforexample*cough*
Do you have a problem with science? It's obvious that practitioners of science spend more time explaining science and scientific work than those who don't. You wouldn't be the first to claim that science is "just an opinion" while it's actually the opposite. Despite incidents and problems it's the best method we humans have to determine how the world works and to gain knowledge about the world.
That is philosophy, not science.
What you call science should be called human point of view.
Modern science is based on sound and reasonable principles. Although some research isn't done properly, the method as a whole outperforms an arbitrary "human point of view".
Why are you acting like you know everything, running boy? So far I haven't heard a single "proof" from you on the actual subject, except for human point of view. I myself have given you plenty of proof.
I don't think you know what the word "proof" means. Even many students have difficulty providing a "proof". Handwaving and arguments are not proof. Only a rigorous explanation can be a proof.
Science is all about trying to explain things human brain can't understand, so everyone who's involved in trying to explain science, only make themselves look dumb. *Cough*Scientistsforexample*cough*
Do you have a problem with science? It's obvious that practitioners of science spend more time explaining science and scientific work than those who don't. You wouldn't be the first to claim that science is "just an opinion" while it's actually the opposite. Despite incidents and problems it's the best method we humans have to determine how the world works and to gain knowledge about the world.
