Reply to Re: Duplicate Account Court: Skull / Dertin / Dertin2 / Jameil / Slime
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Examining and comparing Dertin2's posts and Skull's posts their definitely seems to be a personality trend between them... and I have not found any evidence to show that Dertin2 has ever been on at the same time as Skull, which I would expect to happen at least once.
Skull's story seems off to me, as soon as Marpro asked Dertin2 what happened to Skull, Skull suddenly appeared after being absent for three days. That would have been the 20th, when he claims to have returned from vacation- that makes sense. What doesn't make sense is that he he posted on the 19th, the 18th, and the 11th... all times he was supposed to be on vacation. If he went on vacation, it was for ONE week. He probably meant one week, still the story is not convincing.
That week Dertin2 happened to be very active.
Also the posts for th 19th and 18th of Skull's were either followed or preceded WITHIN MINUTES by a series of posts by Dertin2. Unfortunately, Skull posts only one post each of those days, and each represents a break in a chain of fairly regular posts by Dertin2 over the course of the day.
You are friends and family: Why wait until now to bring this up? Others have been claiming Dertin2 to be Skull for the last couple of days now.
While none of these points are conclusive, I find them suspicious.
It is quite likely that Dertin2 is a duplicate.
NO OFFENSE Skull: I enjoy the comments made by both you and Dertin2. It's just that I don't find the scenarios that you presented very unlikely, and what evidence I have provided added to redink1's pretty much swings my vote from a MAYBE to a GUILTY. I do agree with Chrispy and Scratcher, though. I cannot think of any thing bad or policy breaking that has been committed other than the multiple accounts. As long as Dertin isn't trying to get us to agree with Skull or vice-versa, I personally see no problem. I would reccomend giving them a 3 month grace period, at the end of which, their posts can be reviewed to see that Dertin2 really is being used to sockpuppet whatever Skull says. If Skull cannot convince us that Dertin2 is not a double by the end of that period I move that Dertin2 immediately be debunked. I also move that we make this topic sticky for the time being at least.
Skull's story seems off to me, as soon as Marpro asked Dertin2 what happened to Skull, Skull suddenly appeared after being absent for three days. That would have been the 20th, when he claims to have returned from vacation- that makes sense. What doesn't make sense is that he he posted on the 19th, the 18th, and the 11th... all times he was supposed to be on vacation. If he went on vacation, it was for ONE week. He probably meant one week, still the story is not convincing.
That week Dertin2 happened to be very active.
Also the posts for th 19th and 18th of Skull's were either followed or preceded WITHIN MINUTES by a series of posts by Dertin2. Unfortunately, Skull posts only one post each of those days, and each represents a break in a chain of fairly regular posts by Dertin2 over the course of the day.
You are friends and family: Why wait until now to bring this up? Others have been claiming Dertin2 to be Skull for the last couple of days now.
While none of these points are conclusive, I find them suspicious.
It is quite likely that Dertin2 is a duplicate.
NO OFFENSE Skull: I enjoy the comments made by both you and Dertin2. It's just that I don't find the scenarios that you presented very unlikely, and what evidence I have provided added to redink1's pretty much swings my vote from a MAYBE to a GUILTY. I do agree with Chrispy and Scratcher, though. I cannot think of any thing bad or policy breaking that has been committed other than the multiple accounts. As long as Dertin isn't trying to get us to agree with Skull or vice-versa, I personally see no problem. I would reccomend giving them a 3 month grace period, at the end of which, their posts can be reviewed to see that Dertin2 really is being used to sockpuppet whatever Skull says. If Skull cannot convince us that Dertin2 is not a double by the end of that period I move that Dertin2 immediately be debunked. I also move that we make this topic sticky for the time being at least.
