Reply to Re: Who honestly wants a new forum?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
The RTSoft forum idea wouldn't work. Why? I don't know. But the fact that we are talking about it as an idea, even though the forum is just a couple of clicks away, shows that it isn't working.
EDIT: We have 4 options as of now. The first and easiest being, we simply change our behavior. However, I feel that it wouldn't help. In fact, I feel that if things were as good as they were in 2001, people would still be complaining, simply cause they are not interested in Dink itself anymore (not enough real Dinkers). 2nd option, RTSoft forums. It's not a bad idea, but I doubt it would work. If we wanted to move to the RTSoft forum, we would have already done it. 3rd, new forum. Even though I suggested this, I really don't like the idea. It's the most likelier option to get things better right now, but still. Last option, contact Redink. I've looked into this, and I see he really ain't replying to anyone. He's as good as dead to us. The best option to get in touch with him would probably be to ask Seth if he can contact Dan.
EDIT: We have 4 options as of now. The first and easiest being, we simply change our behavior. However, I feel that it wouldn't help. In fact, I feel that if things were as good as they were in 2001, people would still be complaining, simply cause they are not interested in Dink itself anymore (not enough real Dinkers). 2nd option, RTSoft forums. It's not a bad idea, but I doubt it would work. If we wanted to move to the RTSoft forum, we would have already done it. 3rd, new forum. Even though I suggested this, I really don't like the idea. It's the most likelier option to get things better right now, but still. Last option, contact Redink. I've looked into this, and I see he really ain't replying to anyone. He's as good as dead to us. The best option to get in touch with him would probably be to ask Seth if he can contact Dan.
