The Dink Network

Reply to Re: A cure for cancer found

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
August 3rd 2011, 06:39 AM
custom_skull.gif
Skull
Peasant He/Him Finland bloop
A Disembodied Sod 
How are they all controlled by one entity? Pharma companies have no control over the majority of university/public sector academics. You argue that the academics are not reliable, yet where do you think that blog got his information from? Here's a hint: the academics. If the academics were part of some conspiracy to keep DCA for cancer secret they would never have published their findings.

Good, keep it that way. It will save you from a lot of headache.

you believe that the drug has been proven as a cure for cancer

It has. I think it's better than the nothing we have currently. This drug can destroy the cancer momentarily, and could be used again and again so the cancer will not be able to come back.

No patient with cancer has received DCA within a clinical trial.

First, that was from 2008. Second, this has been tested on human cells. It's basically the same if you tested it on humans.

And no offense, but if one of the sites you're gonna direct me into, is Wikipedia, you're making me trust even less in your sources.

It almost seems you want all the cancer patients to die rather than at least have a drug that can give them a small glimpse of hope.