Reply to Re: PETA KILLS ANIMALS?!?!
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Skull:
Again...your reading comprehension skills are lacking.
"Also, SkeleTony, I have graduated without turning into a sadistic, psychotic who will one day graduate from torturing defenseless puppies and kittens to killing children (and never been close), although I wouldn't think it would be a surprise with everything I've been through."
I cannot even parse that bizarre run on sentence. What does your "graduating"(from school?!) have to do with this? I would be seriously shocked if you actually WERE a psychotic individual BTW. You seem to have entirely missed my point.
Hint: Take note of my wording in the previous post directed at you. It leaves room for a much more likely option than your actually being an immoral psychotic who will one day become a serial killer. If you actually believed in what you wrote in those previous posts about it being alright to kill defenseless animals because you are having difficulty with a perceived lack of concern for humans on their part then yes, you would be someone that psychiatrists should keep an eye on.
" Now, what I think about this (and you don't have to agree with me) is that we have complete right to do so, because I am sure that if for example, dogs were in humans position, they would do the exact same things to us."
You see THIS is the sort of childish nonsense that is getting you in trouble here. You are somehow putting non-abstract thinking animals on par with humans and, for whatever bizarre reason, assuming that IF they were capable of human-like thinking and the cruelty that often goes along with such, they would hate us. And you are using this groundless assumption as justification for inflicting cruelty on them...when they are NOT even capable of the 'What if' postulation you cited as justification for your antagonism.
To call that 'foolish' would be a grave injustice against fools!
Again...your reading comprehension skills are lacking.
"Also, SkeleTony, I have graduated without turning into a sadistic, psychotic who will one day graduate from torturing defenseless puppies and kittens to killing children (and never been close), although I wouldn't think it would be a surprise with everything I've been through."
I cannot even parse that bizarre run on sentence. What does your "graduating"(from school?!) have to do with this? I would be seriously shocked if you actually WERE a psychotic individual BTW. You seem to have entirely missed my point.
Hint: Take note of my wording in the previous post directed at you. It leaves room for a much more likely option than your actually being an immoral psychotic who will one day become a serial killer. If you actually believed in what you wrote in those previous posts about it being alright to kill defenseless animals because you are having difficulty with a perceived lack of concern for humans on their part then yes, you would be someone that psychiatrists should keep an eye on.
" Now, what I think about this (and you don't have to agree with me) is that we have complete right to do so, because I am sure that if for example, dogs were in humans position, they would do the exact same things to us."
You see THIS is the sort of childish nonsense that is getting you in trouble here. You are somehow putting non-abstract thinking animals on par with humans and, for whatever bizarre reason, assuming that IF they were capable of human-like thinking and the cruelty that often goes along with such, they would hate us. And you are using this groundless assumption as justification for inflicting cruelty on them...when they are NOT even capable of the 'What if' postulation you cited as justification for your antagonism.
To call that 'foolish' would be a grave injustice against fools!
