Samurai
i want to ask something, You know that dinksmallwood is a medieval game, nearly every d-mod too, why haven“t anyone made a samurai
d-mod? You know, you can have both guns, sword's, spears and think of the cool characters! the "sengoku jidai" period in japan is more intresting (And bloodier) than you think, i know it would be hard to make all new graphics, i want to try it myself but you can say i should burn in hell when i ask how you make a d-mod, beacause i am that bad...
But think of it! the longsword should be a katana, Clawsword= no-dachi and the light sword could be some sort of macical sword... And to also have some sort of 1600-century gun!
think of it, are someone here intrested in making such d-mod?
d-mod? You know, you can have both guns, sword's, spears and think of the cool characters! the "sengoku jidai" period in japan is more intresting (And bloodier) than you think, i know it would be hard to make all new graphics, i want to try it myself but you can say i should burn in hell when i ask how you make a d-mod, beacause i am that bad...

But think of it! the longsword should be a katana, Clawsword= no-dachi and the light sword could be some sort of macical sword... And to also have some sort of 1600-century gun!
think of it, are someone here intrested in making such d-mod?
Stop complaining and start making ok?
How the heck shall i do that when i dont know how to add graphics, make a starting position, to script, to make enemies attack,etc, etc...
i could take graphics from battle realms as there is graphics of samurais there or maybe shogun total war then make the figures bigger...
i could take graphics from battle realms as there is graphics of samurais there or maybe shogun total war then make the figures bigger...
How the heck shall i do that when i dont know how to add graphics, make a starting position, to script, to make enemies attack,etc, etc..
It's not hard and there are enough tutorials available
It's not hard and there are enough tutorials available

No. And if you do, you might want to read them again. A few times. All you need comes in the develop/ folder.
If you actually do read them, it certainly doesn't show.
If you actually do read them, it certainly doesn't show.
Well, it's not like they are the easiest thing to comprehend. Probably up there on the order of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Phooey! You know dang well what I ment, and don't try to get around it.
If that ones two easy for you, then figure out the function that has the points (.25,64), (.4,25), (.6,11.1), (1,4), (2,1). Nyeah.

If that ones two easy for you, then figure out the function that has the points (.25,64), (.4,25), (.6,11.1), (1,4), (2,1). Nyeah.

Only for values of x >.24855
Really, It isn't that difficult. It's not like I'm asking you figure out max and min lines for error values or anything like that. But I still *would* be impressed if you figured it out. It took me a good 3/4 hour personally.

y = 321.94 x^4 - 1335.077 x^3 + 1867.852 x^2 - 1090.102 x + 239.388
Not quite.... moreso y = 4x^-2
/Deep down, I'm laughing at you
//Only if for the fact that I'm in a library
/Deep down, I'm laughing at you
//Only if for the fact that I'm in a library
show-offs!!
So you know something about a little latin sentence...
And you can find some complicated functions..., like you'll ever need that in life.
No, sorry, i've seen too much latin and too much failed math-tests et il n'y importe quoi...
now I'm a show-off! hey, this feels gooooood
. Tell me, what can you do? Something impressing???

So you know something about a little latin sentence...
And you can find some complicated functions..., like you'll ever need that in life.
No, sorry, i've seen too much latin and too much failed math-tests et il n'y importe quoi...


I can jump off very big houses. Not so much impressive as stupid, but still...
Er... I can take a Ph.D. in math and not get credit for it.
/danged schedule...
//ONE STUPID CLASS!!
Edit
///*can take* not *took* but probably *will take*
/danged schedule...
//ONE STUPID CLASS!!
Edit
///*can take* not *took* but probably *will take*
Excuse me but what the fudge? Graph that and then tell me it does not pass through those points. If you happen to say that then you either are lying or need a new calculator. Well actually you'd be lying in both cases...
I even extended the numbers so you couldn't complain that you were .001 off:
y = 321.938776 x^4 - 1335.076531 x^3 +1867.852041 x^2 -1090.102041 x + 239.387755
I even extended the numbers so you couldn't complain that you were .001 off:
y = 321.938776 x^4 - 1335.076531 x^3 +1867.852041 x^2 -1090.102041 x + 239.387755
Okay, okay, I agree, it goes through those points. But it's not at *all* elagant, and... well.. I didn't need to use trial and error for mine. (Sorta. I had to make a second graph to figure out the coefficant of x)