The Dink Network

Reply to Re: A word on dir.ff

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 10th 2002, 07:28 AM
custom_king.png
redink1
King He/Him United States bloop
A mother ducking wizard 
: That wont happen. Dir.ff doesn't compess AT ALL, it just sticks all the files together in a nice table, how nice. Last, it doesn't protect your files at all. Anyone with a hex editor can crack it in 5 seconds and have all the .bmp's.

Silly rabbit.

True, the dir.ff format by itself doesn't compress AT ALL, but a zipped dir.ff file will always be smaller than a zipped collection of the original bmps.

Why? Typical zip compression compresses each file individually, looking for repetitious bytes. With a dir.ff file, it finds much more repetitious bytes, because all of the bmps are in the same file.

Also, using a hex-editor to extract bmps is a complete pain... I know I could do it, but I've never been tempted because it simply isn't worth the effort.