Reply to Re: ninja dev progress
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
I only skimmed through the reviews available, granted, but I didn't see any request for a skeleton. Perhaps you meant that people emailed and asked for it?
Regardless of that, I don't think bundling the rewritten .ini with a skeleton is beneficial in any way. Feel free to flaunt the fact that you can copy this dandy .ini over the ones included with pre-existing skeletons, explain to people how to do so if they really don't get it.. that's fine and dandy. But I think bundling files already available here provides an insignificant convenience at best.
My apologies for not informing you of our concern with the file yesterday, and even though it isn't necessarily my fault it isn't readily available, I also apologize for the skeleton rule currently being absent from the Rules and Submitting pages.
Regardless of that, I don't think bundling the rewritten .ini with a skeleton is beneficial in any way. Feel free to flaunt the fact that you can copy this dandy .ini over the ones included with pre-existing skeletons, explain to people how to do so if they really don't get it.. that's fine and dandy. But I think bundling files already available here provides an insignificant convenience at best.
My apologies for not informing you of our concern with the file yesterday, and even though it isn't necessarily my fault it isn't readily available, I also apologize for the skeleton rule currently being absent from the Rules and Submitting pages.
