Reply to Re: let's talk martial law, october 1st
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
This quotes in the article sound reasonable. He has a charitable organization that tries to make the world better.
first i've ever heard of that.
His group OSF clearly states they want to encourage peaceful protests to make society more fair, and the page pretends that they state that OSF wants violent riots. They also do not give links to any of that violence.
see, that's the thing. the organization can say whatever they want to put the blame somewhere else and the US citizens will believe it. by staying in the shadows, soros can act as a puppet master without people realizing what's going on. they may not have links, but i'll go find the video i saw where BLM were chanting about hunting down all white people or whatever - BLM chanting and shit
now, with that new info, it gets even more complex. but the article did say this was the intent of soros's donations and soros's words on "destroying the west to bring about the NWO" fits in as well. there are obviously peaceful protesters, but the police don't care about that. i have seen plenty of footage of police brutality. if this was a response to violence against the police, why are the police stomping on and gang banging citizens who are not fighting back, struggling, and have screamed for help?
Not in number of soldiers, but the US army can easily wipe out any dissidents in the country, should they want to. You think you stand a chance when they come with drones and tanks to your house?
i have heard that our army has lost to farmers with shotguns before or something along those lines. it may be advanced and overpowered, but that's only because the ones making it so are afraid because they know the world is pretty much against them. the absurd money such as the money poured into a 3 trillion dollar fighter jet reflects how they are cowards making dumb choices to cling to the power they unjustly claimed. from what i've noticed about people talking and shit, the army's primary strategy is "BLOW SHIT UP!" but out of the millions and millions of people with guns, there's bound to be a suitable strategy to counter that if it comes to it. plus, the army wouldn't be fighting against the people anyways unless they've been brainwashed enough/get paid enough.
Oops, that should have been "Tim", Hillary's vice presidential candidate. So instead of a badass name, it's one of the most common names there is.
oh, the association with hillary makes that even less cool.
I'm afraid I disagree with you on that one. There is a real threat of Hitler-like things happening in the government, but it isn't coming from the black people that get shot and killed. Instead, it comes from the possible future president, Trump.
while these are true, trump wouldn't be able to organize such a thing as the nazis did. i've gathered that trump is more of an entertainer who has no clue how to run anything except real estate. something as big as a nazi rule is far out of reach. hillary, on the other hand, has ordered assassinations, covered up emails i don't remember the contents of, and is only running for a world record despite being ready to die sometime soon. plus, soros has donated hugely to the clinton foundation. they're close partners in crime.
they're both shitty candidates and this is by far the worst election so far, but trump may be the lesser of the two evils. not by a whole lot, but enough that we might be safer. maybe. (not voting, because votes don't count)
first i've ever heard of that.
His group OSF clearly states they want to encourage peaceful protests to make society more fair, and the page pretends that they state that OSF wants violent riots. They also do not give links to any of that violence.
see, that's the thing. the organization can say whatever they want to put the blame somewhere else and the US citizens will believe it. by staying in the shadows, soros can act as a puppet master without people realizing what's going on. they may not have links, but i'll go find the video i saw where BLM were chanting about hunting down all white people or whatever - BLM chanting and shit
now, with that new info, it gets even more complex. but the article did say this was the intent of soros's donations and soros's words on "destroying the west to bring about the NWO" fits in as well. there are obviously peaceful protesters, but the police don't care about that. i have seen plenty of footage of police brutality. if this was a response to violence against the police, why are the police stomping on and gang banging citizens who are not fighting back, struggling, and have screamed for help?
Not in number of soldiers, but the US army can easily wipe out any dissidents in the country, should they want to. You think you stand a chance when they come with drones and tanks to your house?
i have heard that our army has lost to farmers with shotguns before or something along those lines. it may be advanced and overpowered, but that's only because the ones making it so are afraid because they know the world is pretty much against them. the absurd money such as the money poured into a 3 trillion dollar fighter jet reflects how they are cowards making dumb choices to cling to the power they unjustly claimed. from what i've noticed about people talking and shit, the army's primary strategy is "BLOW SHIT UP!" but out of the millions and millions of people with guns, there's bound to be a suitable strategy to counter that if it comes to it. plus, the army wouldn't be fighting against the people anyways unless they've been brainwashed enough/get paid enough.
Oops, that should have been "Tim", Hillary's vice presidential candidate. So instead of a badass name, it's one of the most common names there is.
oh, the association with hillary makes that even less cool.
I'm afraid I disagree with you on that one. There is a real threat of Hitler-like things happening in the government, but it isn't coming from the black people that get shot and killed. Instead, it comes from the possible future president, Trump.
while these are true, trump wouldn't be able to organize such a thing as the nazis did. i've gathered that trump is more of an entertainer who has no clue how to run anything except real estate. something as big as a nazi rule is far out of reach. hillary, on the other hand, has ordered assassinations, covered up emails i don't remember the contents of, and is only running for a world record despite being ready to die sometime soon. plus, soros has donated hugely to the clinton foundation. they're close partners in crime.
they're both shitty candidates and this is by far the worst election so far, but trump may be the lesser of the two evils. not by a whole lot, but enough that we might be safer. maybe. (not voting, because votes don't count)
