Reply to Re: Bad potion script?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Strangely I don't. I just tested it, and when I use wait(1) I got values around 32, with wait(25) I got values of around 22. This means in practice that a wait(1) command would take about 32 ms to execute and a wait(25) takes 49 ms. Also I found that a wait(50) takes about 71 ms, for values higher than that I'd have to revise my method of measuring to have a sufficient resolution. But this does seem to suggest that even higher values for wait() have quite a bit of room for error.
All of this is, of course, assuming that a wait(1000) takes 1000 ms.
Also, this measurement might be distorted by the fact that the script is initiated on entering the screen, when the engine is a little bit busy. I might set up a more detailed measuring later. (I've gotten a little curious.)
All of this is, of course, assuming that a wait(1000) takes 1000 ms.
Also, this measurement might be distorted by the fact that the script is initiated on entering the screen, when the engine is a little bit busy. I might set up a more detailed measuring later. (I've gotten a little curious.)