Can we at least add a quoting feature to the forums? (Closed)
Pleeeeeease?
This site is missing BASIC and FUNDAMENTAL features of even a forum from back then.
This site is missing BASIC and FUNDAMENTAL features of even a forum from back then.
You mean the one all the way at the bottom of the page, or a "click here to reply and copy what the person you're replying to just said" thing?
Because it's not hard to copy-paste lines of text and add an italics <> pair and quote marks to it.
Because it's not hard to copy-paste lines of text and add an italics <> pair and quote marks to it.
Pleeeeeease?
This site is missing BASIC and FUNDAMENTAL features of even a forum from back then.
Yes, indeed
It'd be nice; I don't have any problem with copying-and-italics though.
This site is missing BASIC and FUNDAMENTAL features of even a forum from back then.
Yes, indeed
It'd be nice; I don't have any problem with copying-and-italics though.
If it wouldn't be too much of a hassle, then yes please.
Maybe i've just been spoiled by forums since 2002.
Well, if people used the nested view rather than flat, I think it'd be fine. Copy+pasting in italic is also fine. A quoting feature is unnecessary.
i'm not saying it's necessary
i'm just saying it'd be nice.
hey, cars aren't NECESSARY but that doesn't mean we need to walk everywhere
i'm just saying it'd be nice.
hey, cars aren't NECESSARY but that doesn't mean we need to walk everywhere
A few years ago I wrote my own Greasemonkey script that would automatically quote a post upon pressing the reply button. I used it for a while but never released it because it was so unrefined. These days I usually use bold and italics of what the other person said if I want to point something out.
Interestingly enough the feature formerly existed here and was removed when the site got updated many years ago.
Interestingly enough the feature formerly existed here and was removed when the site got updated many years ago.
: : : : Maybe i've just been spoiled by forums since 2002.
: : : Well, if people used the nested view rather than flat, I think it'd be fine. Copy+pasting in italic is also fine. A quoting feature is unnecessary.
: : i'm not saying it's necessary
: : i'm just saying it'd be nice.
: : hey, cars aren't NECESSARY but that doesn't mean we need to walk everywhere
: A few years ago I wrote my own Greasemonkey script that would automatically quote a post upon pressing the reply button. I used it for a while but never released it because it was so unrefined. These days I usually use bold and italics of what the other person said if I want to point something out.
: Interestingly enough the feature formerly existed here and was removed when the site got updated many years ago.
Oh yeah, that's a good point. I have no recollection of it, but if you look at the oldest posts on this forum, you'll notice they look pretty atrocious... I wonder if the old message board added some formatting into it. Then again, the old board looked pretty atrocious altogether, so maybe that was all it ever did. I'd guess nested view was designed as a replacement for the old quote system.
: : : Well, if people used the nested view rather than flat, I think it'd be fine. Copy+pasting in italic is also fine. A quoting feature is unnecessary.
: : i'm not saying it's necessary
: : i'm just saying it'd be nice.
: : hey, cars aren't NECESSARY but that doesn't mean we need to walk everywhere
: A few years ago I wrote my own Greasemonkey script that would automatically quote a post upon pressing the reply button. I used it for a while but never released it because it was so unrefined. These days I usually use bold and italics of what the other person said if I want to point something out.
: Interestingly enough the feature formerly existed here and was removed when the site got updated many years ago.
Oh yeah, that's a good point. I have no recollection of it, but if you look at the oldest posts on this forum, you'll notice they look pretty atrocious... I wonder if the old message board added some formatting into it. Then again, the old board looked pretty atrocious altogether, so maybe that was all it ever did. I'd guess nested view was designed as a replacement for the old quote system.
@Scratch, Is it possible for the staff to change the site in ways other than banning Skurn or is Redink the only one that can?
Its no use, Dack. All the scrubs of the internet gather here because they can't get banned.
I can't remember either but I think it placed a white box around those lines beginning with a colon. I'm almost tempted to make a little userscript to make it work again.
quiz you're a total asshat
i'm just telling you.
you really are. i'm not evgen trolling, i don't troll.
you're a scumbag.
i'm just telling you.
you really are. i'm not evgen trolling, i don't troll.
you're a scumbag.
And what's your problem all of a sudden, Kerrek? If you aren't trolling then why are you going all rage-mode bananas on me for?
Because i feel that you deserve it?
I find that very unsatisfying coming out of the blue like this. Does more of you feel the same?
It wasn't really meant to satisfy you.
"Does more of you feel the same?"
Are you asking other members? I legit have trouble understanding that one (not malicious, legit curious)
"Does more of you feel the same?"
Are you asking other members? I legit have trouble understanding that one (not malicious, legit curious)
Ok, be that way then. I'm very confused why you suddenly act like this towards me. You seem to react to my grammar and rightfully so as English is not my native tongue.
Yes, I was asking other members because you have no reason to be this way. I may nag a bit towards the permanent trolls here from time to time, but that's it.
Yes, I was asking other members because you have no reason to be this way. I may nag a bit towards the permanent trolls here from time to time, but that's it.
I don't get it, nor see any reason for Kerrek to be angry at you Quiz.
Figured I'd answer for once rather than lurk like I have with most threads recently because that seemed like quite a sudden post, unless he took your response to Dack as a personal affront.
Figured I'd answer for once rather than lurk like I have with most threads recently because that seemed like quite a sudden post, unless he took your response to Dack as a personal affront.
@Exdeathevn
I have my reasons, and so do the people that led me to think so.
I have my reasons, and so do the people that led me to think so.
Can we at least get back on track with the topic, even if that's not the DN way?
/reads dackfight's post
/read's dackfight's tagline
/read's dackfight's tagline
Don't think I got a funny feeling when I pressed submit, but it also seems unnatural for you two to fight, and it would be nice to know if we can implement a quoting feature, so if I ever want to quote someone I won't need to copy and paste and other things.
So when did you become such a dickhead, Kerrek? Did you hit puberty or something? Or did Uncle Skorn promise ice cream if you joined his club? Don't forget to stick a "no girls allowed" sign on the door.
I still haven't got my ice cream yet
Maybe there was a PM war?
Maybe there was a PM war?
Oh look here comes the drooling ponyducker to tell me i'm acting childish.
How young do you think I am? Just young enough to lure me into your van?
How young do you think I am? Just young enough to lure me into your van?
Well it does seem like you are acting a little childish, if needed you and Quiz could settle it through a PM.
Not young enough to be lured into vans, but apparently young and stupid enough to be dragged and manipulated into other people's fights.
If Skurn bought a van, he better sell it to give me my ice cream.
Hey, Skull. Glad to see you're still bringing me up.
Can we all, you know, not argue amongst ourselves for a moment, exchange a few apologies and whatnot?
Thanks guys, you all know me I can get feisty at times here. I guess my legit opinions about Google were highly frowned upon, that's all. :/