Reply to Improvements
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
With a file this big there are inevitably going to be errors, even after proofreading. So yet another version of this file is coming. I already made quite an extensive list of (mostly small) fixes I'll implement for the next version, but I would love some feedback from the community as well.
If you already posted a comment in the news thread or wrote a review: I read it all, so whatever you said will be taken into consideration. I might not agree, but I will take it into consideration...
So if you know anything that should be improved, let me know. I'm not going to add large pieces of text for this version as I think the file is heavy enough as it is right now. But if you spotted something you think is wrong or unclear let me know!
(Also, if you think something should be added let me know. It might not make it into this version, but it will be taken into consideration for the future.)
If you already posted a comment in the news thread or wrote a review: I read it all, so whatever you said will be taken into consideration. I might not agree, but I will take it into consideration...
So if you know anything that should be improved, let me know. I'm not going to add large pieces of text for this version as I think the file is heavy enough as it is right now. But if you spotted something you think is wrong or unclear let me know!
(Also, if you think something should be added let me know. It might not make it into this version, but it will be taken into consideration for the future.)
