Reply to Re: New Graphics File - Angel Graphics
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
There are a few problems with these graphics.
1)The name is misleading, it isn't an angel, just a "light effect."
2)The edges do not look good at all IMO.
3)The last thing is that the white of the graphics isn't transparent in true color mode. I must add that the graphics don't look that good when not in true color mode as the colors aren't right.
5)It might look better with a checkerboard transparent effect (like the shadows.)
These are some things that make the graphics unappealing. Please take in consideration to fix some of these problems. As far as not looking good in non true color mode, just add it in the readme.txt that it works best in true color mode (if you haven't already.) And because the name is so misleading and the file size is up there (for dinkers with a bad connection), I'd put up a screenshot.
This isn't a review because I wanted to give you a chance to make the file better first
1)The name is misleading, it isn't an angel, just a "light effect."
2)The edges do not look good at all IMO.
3)The last thing is that the white of the graphics isn't transparent in true color mode. I must add that the graphics don't look that good when not in true color mode as the colors aren't right.
5)It might look better with a checkerboard transparent effect (like the shadows.)
These are some things that make the graphics unappealing. Please take in consideration to fix some of these problems. As far as not looking good in non true color mode, just add it in the readme.txt that it works best in true color mode (if you haven't already.) And because the name is so misleading and the file size is up there (for dinkers with a bad connection), I'd put up a screenshot.
This isn't a review because I wanted to give you a chance to make the file better first
