The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Rankings suck ass

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
December 12th 2002, 03:05 AM
stonegiant.gif
: Yup, it's just true.

: However, I know something that could be done to improve the rankings, check this:

: mini review: 1

: full review: 3

: misc file: 4

: dmod demo: 5

: dev file: 6

: dmod romp: 7

: dmod quest: 10

: dmod epic: 15

: good idea for improvement of rankings (this one): 10000000

: take it into consideration, redinkdude

NoooO!! for me, the main thing i want in a nrankings system is to REMOVE the difference between full and mini reviews. why? because the "fullness" of a review is determined by staff members every time they are created/modified, and they seem to change between full and mini every time you change them, which makes a mockery of the entire rankings system. i suggest either:

scrub the rankings. why have them at all? i mean, we all know who does the work in this community. and anyway, does the rankings system work out how much work I'm doing on ddmodd, or do i ahve to stop and write reviews?

or: do something like this:

1 point for reviews

10 points * ARS

simple, eh? yeah yeah, epic vs romp dmods, bleh bleh bleh yadda yadda yadda.

BTW, party at my new flat tomorrow night, you're all invited. email me for the address. (In NZ tho)