Reply to Re: Overall Rankings...can we have them back please?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
: : : What the..... ??? Ehasl was under my name at the old list... Strange :S :S :S
: : Well, I worked really hard on this new algorithm... from what I've understood, it most accuratly represents the overall rankings. Well, much better than the previous attempts at least.
: why dont you give us the source? :D
Because it is a good 4-5 pages of printed text, consisting of about 9000 or so characters. Its really complex... it takes in account everything quantifiable about a user (number of reviews, number of comments, scores of files, number of hits per message on the board, and so much more), and spits out the result. Because the quantifiable aspects of the users will change greatly over the course of even a day, the results will reflect that change.
: : Well, I worked really hard on this new algorithm... from what I've understood, it most accuratly represents the overall rankings. Well, much better than the previous attempts at least.
: why dont you give us the source? :D
Because it is a good 4-5 pages of printed text, consisting of about 9000 or so characters. Its really complex... it takes in account everything quantifiable about a user (number of reviews, number of comments, scores of files, number of hits per message on the board, and so much more), and spits out the result. Because the quantifiable aspects of the users will change greatly over the course of even a day, the results will reflect that change.
