The Dink Network

Reply to Re: reveiws: mini Vs Full problems

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 23rd 2002, 03:54 PM
custom_king.png
redink1
King He/Him United States bloop
A mother ducking wizard 
: Persoanlly, i think that maybe all reviews should have teh same amount of points, and teh full and mini distinctions should be removed.

That is a possibility... I'm thinking about it.

: anyway, if you want to get points, surely ti should be done by releasing files??

Um... no. As I saw in the various implementations of 'points' over the past year or so, giving points for files brought out the worst in people. People would just release crap, in an idiotic quest to get points. Crap files are damaging.

As it is, people reviewing only for points isn't that bad... their reviews have to be approved, and therefore usually aren't crap.

And the weighting of reviews is generally beneficial as well... for those who care about the Reviewer rankings, it motivtates them to write Full Reviews instead of Mini Reviews. And Full Reviews are much more beneficial to people trying to find a file to download than minis.