Reply to Re: Using AI to generate graphics/music/etc for Dink
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
I'm firmly in the anti-AI camp. The ecological impact of it is my biggest grievance. Also, I really dislike how the economy is betting everything on its success- as if it's inevitable.
If it's about the usual arguments against AI of art theft via training data, or job loss due to AI replacement then I would say it doesn't really matter for Dink related projects. Though, I think it's still problematic.
I just can't personally justify the amount of energy and water AI uses for such lackluster results. I'm not sure I could even justify the cost for good results.
There are a few exceptions for where I find AI use acceptable or even encourage it's growth(one such place being the field of medicine) but overall I find it to be pretty awful and will be completely disinterested in any project that uses it.
If it's about the usual arguments against AI of art theft via training data, or job loss due to AI replacement then I would say it doesn't really matter for Dink related projects. Though, I think it's still problematic.
I just can't personally justify the amount of energy and water AI uses for such lackluster results. I'm not sure I could even justify the cost for good results.
There are a few exceptions for where I find AI use acceptable or even encourage it's growth(one such place being the field of medicine) but overall I find it to be pretty awful and will be completely disinterested in any project that uses it.
