Reply to Re: dmod reviews
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
So I,ve been looking at dmod reviews and I find the discrepancies in scores for some of these dmods to be quite fascinating! Here are some of the more interesting cases I found (I didn't look at every dmod, these are just some of the ones that stood out.):
"Counter Strike CTF" gets a 7.5 from the famous Simon K, and a 0.0 from the almost-as-famous Scratcher.
"Legend of the Duck" gets two scores of 8.0, but gets a score as low as 1.0.
"Revenge of the Duck" gets two scores of 8.5, but gets a score as low as 1.0.
"Progeny" gets a score as high as 8.5 and as low as 0.5.
"Search for Milli Vanilli" gets scores ranging from 8.5 to 1.0.
"Crystal of Power" gets the following scores" 8.0, 8.0, 0.8, 0.0! With four reviews there is nothing between 8.0 and 0.8!
And the biggest discrepancy I found was with "Ex-peppermint" which scored as high as 9.7 and as low as 0.3!!
The lesson here: don't take any score too seriously.
On a side note: Simon k. gave his own "Creeping Sands" a 9.3 (way, way too high), but he gave "Cloud Castle 2: Scarab" only an 8.9!! Come on now!
"Counter Strike CTF" gets a 7.5 from the famous Simon K, and a 0.0 from the almost-as-famous Scratcher.
"Legend of the Duck" gets two scores of 8.0, but gets a score as low as 1.0.
"Revenge of the Duck" gets two scores of 8.5, but gets a score as low as 1.0.
"Progeny" gets a score as high as 8.5 and as low as 0.5.
"Search for Milli Vanilli" gets scores ranging from 8.5 to 1.0.
"Crystal of Power" gets the following scores" 8.0, 8.0, 0.8, 0.0! With four reviews there is nothing between 8.0 and 0.8!
And the biggest discrepancy I found was with "Ex-peppermint" which scored as high as 9.7 and as low as 0.3!!
The lesson here: don't take any score too seriously.
On a side note: Simon k. gave his own "Creeping Sands" a 9.3 (way, way too high), but he gave "Cloud Castle 2: Scarab" only an 8.9!! Come on now!
