The Dink Network

Reply to Re: dmod reviews

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
August 6th 2015, 09:34 PM
custom_skull.gif
Skull
Peasant He/Him Finland bloop
A Disembodied Sod 
You do realize I pointed out things I liked about them too, right? I think you need to learn what biased means.

You barely pointed out any positive things about the D-Mods. You only added an occasional ridiculous "positive" remark so your review wouldn't appear completely biased. Clever trick, but it's fairly obvious. Especially if you read the other reviews and notice how much your reviews clash with them. Your reviews are also full of false statements as well as opinions without explanation. "This isn't good", "I didn't like this", "This sucks", but never did you explain why. I also find it funny that you obviously forced these negative aspects into your mind, because the real negative things in the games, you left out. You also left out a ton of positive things on purpose, one good example being the lore which is one of the most highly praised parts about both games.

Let's face it, you would've given both of those D-Mods a 0.0. score if you could, just to be a jerk, but you settled for giving them the lowest possible score you knew the staff would ever approve. You never cared how those D-Mods were in the first place; you had already made up your mind before you played them.