Reply to Re: dmod reviews
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Well Skull, I would write a fair and impartial review for you, but I don't want to have to submit 5 versions of a review before the board will accept one.
With "Dink's Quest for Meaning", we have a dmod with 7 screens where you can control absolutely nothing and it gets a 7.0! The reviewer did a great job of articulating why this dmod sucks. I could not have stated it better myself. But then why the 7.0. This thing was good???
And that thing that Skurn perpetrated on us recently got an 8.5 from someone!!
There is just no rhyme or reason here. I wash my hands. Between the board and these reviews lately, it's just hopeless. Just give any abject piece of crap any ridiculous, obscene score whatever.
So how am I supposed to know if a dmod is actually worth playing or not?
Also, why bother with making something good. When "Sour Gummy Worms" gets an 8.5, scores have lost all meaning any ways. You could create a great work of art and not get a better score than that.
With "Dink's Quest for Meaning", we have a dmod with 7 screens where you can control absolutely nothing and it gets a 7.0! The reviewer did a great job of articulating why this dmod sucks. I could not have stated it better myself. But then why the 7.0. This thing was good???
And that thing that Skurn perpetrated on us recently got an 8.5 from someone!!
There is just no rhyme or reason here. I wash my hands. Between the board and these reviews lately, it's just hopeless. Just give any abject piece of crap any ridiculous, obscene score whatever.
So how am I supposed to know if a dmod is actually worth playing or not?
Also, why bother with making something good. When "Sour Gummy Worms" gets an 8.5, scores have lost all meaning any ways. You could create a great work of art and not get a better score than that.
