Reply to Re: School shooting in Connecticut
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
You're proving that everybody over there is missing the point. The point is that nobody having a gun is much better than everybody having a gun.
Everybody having a gun = Risk: 95%, Benefit: 5%.
Nobody having a gun = The otherwise around.
Because honestly, how many people can say they've defended themselves with a gun? I can honestly say I remember only reading about one case in the last 10 years, where a person has really required a gun to defend herself.
Everybody having a gun = Risk: 95%, Benefit: 5%.
Nobody having a gun = The otherwise around.
Because honestly, how many people can say they've defended themselves with a gun? I can honestly say I remember only reading about one case in the last 10 years, where a person has really required a gun to defend herself.
