Reply to Re: redink1 does your e-mail work?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
: : : : Hi redink1 does your e-mail work? Maybe its the e-mail address on the dink network that is wrong cuz i sent you a file idea just to check to see if its ok like 2 days ago and you have not replied. so im just kinda curiouse as to if your e-0mail is broken or not.
: : : My e-mail seems to be working fine... try sending it again. I have a lot of spam filters, so make sure you put Dink in the subject.
: : Isn't "D-Mod" enough? Hmmmm... so that's why i never manage to send you emails. Hmmmm...
: : (why don't you change the board so " " is written with "D"?)
: : (ugh.. also.. why does it say "Notify me of reply?."?)
: You should learn to write things more clearly ehasl..
: First of all, you should say why isn't " " written like ":D"
: And second, you should've written, "why does the line "Notify me of reply?." have both a question mark and a dot at the end?
: Yeah redink1, good questions.. I also have one. Why isn't ">
" written like "> " or "> " instead? That's better for two reasons. One, that's really more what the smiley looks like, and two, it wouldn't mess up the "sp_> " command.
lol.. seems like it < messed up that one...
< + ( = <
: : : My e-mail seems to be working fine... try sending it again. I have a lot of spam filters, so make sure you put Dink in the subject.
: : Isn't "D-Mod" enough? Hmmmm... so that's why i never manage to send you emails. Hmmmm...
: : (why don't you change the board so "
" is written with "D"?): : (ugh.. also.. why does it say "Notify me of reply?."?)
: You should learn to write things more clearly ehasl..
: First of all, you should say why isn't "
" written like ":D": And second, you should've written, "why does the line "Notify me of reply?." have both a question mark and a dot at the end?
: Yeah redink1, good questions.. I also have one. Why isn't ">
" written like "> " or "> " instead? That's better for two reasons. One, that's really more what the smiley looks like, and two, it wouldn't mess up the "sp_> " command.lol.. seems like it < messed up that one...
< + ( = <
