Reply to Re: Stop the rat torture in Newchurch
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Sorry if I came across saying that I supported torture of animals/animal testing, cause I don't. I just didn't like the site as its using the urban belief that guinea pigs are in some way 'better' than rats, which I don't really see, in order to promote sympathy for there cause, and make a buck. They don't even say what kind of animal testing goes on with the rats. They say,: "..until they arrive at the laboratories where they will die in vicious and useless experiments" Useless. Hmmm. Thats it. Would there supporters be so for them if they learnt just what these useless experiments were? ex: Shampoo/Conditioner, soaps, skin care products, most anything that has a danger or warning sign (how do you think that they find out what this or that might do?), most types of medicine and quite a bit more.
I also wonder how these pictures were made? Because if the guy let the photographers come in, these are probably rare cases that are really bad, or if not, did they break and enter or tresspass?
I don't really know. Some of the pictures look like they don't even come from the farm, almost like they came from laboratories that were already testing on the animals. And why thouse animals look so terrified: You shine a million candlepower or whatever light on a friend less that a meter away and you see if they don't cringe or back away.
Oh yes, and the prominent dead one's: maybe they are ones that died, and were put in a cage in the back to be hauled away later. One can't be certin.
And the living conditions don't look too bad for them. If you do think that thats bad, you should look how they mass produce chickens and egg's, now thats tight.
Gah, I don't even like arguing this side, but still, I have to, as no one here is trying to get the other side of the story.
I don't make the distinction between the two, because at my farm, my ever so thoughtful cousins mercifully released a bunch of them out. Come harvest time, we find out they got into the grain. Made me so freaking angry.....
Oh well. 'scuze the spelling errors, I was in a hurry. Make of this what you will.
Ta.
I also wonder how these pictures were made? Because if the guy let the photographers come in, these are probably rare cases that are really bad, or if not, did they break and enter or tresspass?
I don't really know. Some of the pictures look like they don't even come from the farm, almost like they came from laboratories that were already testing on the animals. And why thouse animals look so terrified: You shine a million candlepower or whatever light on a friend less that a meter away and you see if they don't cringe or back away.
Oh yes, and the prominent dead one's: maybe they are ones that died, and were put in a cage in the back to be hauled away later. One can't be certin.
And the living conditions don't look too bad for them. If you do think that thats bad, you should look how they mass produce chickens and egg's, now thats tight.
Gah, I don't even like arguing this side, but still, I have to, as no one here is trying to get the other side of the story.
I don't make the distinction between the two, because at my farm, my ever so thoughtful cousins mercifully released a bunch of them out. Come harvest time, we find out they got into the grain. Made me so freaking angry.....
Oh well. 'scuze the spelling errors, I was in a hurry. Make of this what you will.
Ta.
