Reply to Re: Seeeemeeeen.
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Whatever, just giving out my opinion. Thought that's what Quiztis wanted. You can't always like others' opinions, sadly.
Dink Wiki should be removed. The problem mainly with this Steam group is, that Dink Wiki also used to have around 25 regular people addings articles, but the popularity faded. Same with the chat, although there are still more people there than in the Wiki. I think if the Steam group remains popular (and if the official tag is removed, aherm) then it maybe should get stickied, though I still don't see the actual point. Dinkers' interests fade quickly, I've noticed, so it's only sensible to wait a while, cause then we would have another useless sticky.
Dink Wiki should be removed. The problem mainly with this Steam group is, that Dink Wiki also used to have around 25 regular people addings articles, but the popularity faded. Same with the chat, although there are still more people there than in the Wiki. I think if the Steam group remains popular (and if the official tag is removed, aherm) then it maybe should get stickied, though I still don't see the actual point. Dinkers' interests fade quickly, I've noticed, so it's only sensible to wait a while, cause then we would have another useless sticky.
