The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Should America go to war?

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
February 15th 2003, 03:56 AM
spike.gif
Ok. Think of all countries as they were persons.. America would obviously be a big muscular man, who thinks more with his di.. than brains. Iraq would most likely be a slippery thief, who takes what he cans and grabs on every chance. Now imagine that Iraq had a grenade - with it even a baby can win a big man. The situation with Iraq is freezed. -If it attacks in America, it'll do it virtually alone.. Now imagine that Iraq has an atom bomb. It doesn't have any use of attacking America with it unless as a last resort, which even then, would only be it's last strike before dieing. (America -> Iraq -> KABOOM)
So basically, America has an advantage. It can delay the war for years if it wants.. But propably, sooner or later, the war WILL begin. What America is being real stupid in here is -- it just doesn't know whether Iraq has chemicals or atom bombs or anything... America should find out more of Iraq before attacking. I don't like delaying things like this... But I say, know your enemy! Besides - Iraq would need dozens of atom bombs and hundreds of thousands of men to survive if America attacks it.. Even though it could win America, other countries would invade it and finally, destroy it. The only advantage in this Bush's oppression is that Iraq will be destroyed sooner.. But 90% surely with more losses than if it would attack in a better time. Thank you. This is my last statement.