Reply to Re: To Decompile or Not to Decompile...
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Compiling does serve some purpose, though. By what I've seen people are more hesitant to steal other people's stuff when it's compiled, whereas they're just going to think the author won't mind when it's not. Though adding a disclaimer in the readme would propably serve the same purpose better (beuc ftw ).
I also agree that telling authors with compiled dmods about the change would be the polite thing to do.
That is only if you make it public, my previous post were more in favor of keeping it secret sinse I dint know you could find it somewhere else, but now that change everything.
Yeah, they seem to be pretty common nowadays. Several people have made their own .d decompilers and there's already an .ff decompiler available on this website with one of the development files.
I also agree that telling authors with compiled dmods about the change would be the polite thing to do.
That is only if you make it public, my previous post were more in favor of keeping it secret sinse I dint know you could find it somewhere else, but now that change everything.
Yeah, they seem to be pretty common nowadays. Several people have made their own .d decompilers and there's already an .ff decompiler available on this website with one of the development files.