The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Nonesensical ramblings

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
May 4th 2007, 02:44 PM
wizard.gif
Chrispy
Peasant He/Him Canada
I'm a man, but I can change, if I have to.I guess. 
Yeah, that's true too. You can get fairly precise probabilities. Now, it's a given that your dealing with such huge quantities that the probabilities just become a measure of the concentrations at the end. I was more thinking that it gets really really hard to predict the exact outcome of a matrix of lets say two separate reactions You have to deal with the end products, the mid-products, and how they all interact, and a myriad of other factors, pressure, heat, electromagnetism. The margin of error goes up, and you try to control those factors to make the margin of error go down.

Then again, one could argue along the same lines for any experimental research. I'm just thinking that there would be a larger amount of error with complicated matrices, but I'm sure I've just not studied far enough to actually start figuring that out. Mostly I'm studying to see if one can make alloys via electrochemisty, and stuff like the salt effect and a similar kind of effect to the salt effect that happens when you make alloys. It's fun stuff.