The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Just a quick suggestion...

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
March 29th 2006, 05:58 PM
custom_magicman.gif
magicman
Peasant They/Them Netherlands duck
Mmmm, pizza. 
For a comparison between all kinds of browsers, check this article at Wikipedia. Do with the information what you want to do (e.g. read, agree, disagree, ignore, print out and eat it, worship it, edit it away):

Comparison of web browsers.

It might not solve the endless browser wars and by no means I intend to prove that Firefox is better than Opera or vice versa, but just to give some actual test results and facts rather than a vague reference like "most computer experts say that FF is the most secure browsers, according to their rigorous tests". I mean, 'most computer expers' can technically mean 50.0001% of them. Also just "their rigorous tests" cannot be verified.
At first: who exactly are those computer experts? Are they the keepers of some PC shop in Middle-Of-Nowhere-City, are they programmers of Firefox or Opera, naturally biased, or are they people who work for Norton at the firewall department?
Secondly, how rigorous are these tests? When is a test called rigorous?

These are things that might be true, but cannot be verified. One person might find a test 'rigorous' and call someone a 'computer expert', while someone else disagrees. Then who's right?