Reply to Re: What Do You Think?
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Okay I will reword that: "The main mission that covers the whole game. And I mean the ONE large mission that incompasses the whole game. I have played games that use that approach.
Actually is it not possible to add things that improve things, yet are not in and of themselves that great? I was simply stating that my dmod would be better than a version of it without those details. You're right... I can't accurately predict it is better... which is why I don't think that.
Actually I was explaining why I said the oriiginal comment, not saying that method is set in stone.
Well if someone states an opnion that has reason and logic behind it I will seriously considered it but so far you have given me no explanations for your opinions so I cannot consider them properly and from all angels.
Actually I was saying that it will improve it, not that it would be a great improvement nor did I make any comments that implied it.
And, I, too am going off what other people have said in the past as I stated. Until now you did not. And from my experience people do eventually get sick of hearing about ANYTHING that is continually talked about but never released.
Really? SabreTrout often makes mean comments and based on the fact that he has files here that are now old, he is obviously no newbie. So just because I make a mean comment does not mean I am a newbie.
Well, actually I doubt everyone here has made dmods. And your comments are the only ones I have made these comments to. Which means there is little evidence that I don't listen since the other messages were ones of support from these same dmod authors you are talking about. I am not going to change something when I get more support than critism. Besides one statement of yours has influenced me. That is this: I am now going to worry about those fussy details at later stages so that my first alphas for my testers can be tested at earlier stages, thus speeding up the development stage since I don't have to correct them later on.
Oh and you have been constantly insulting my intelligence by making comments that include parts that I would have to be stupid to not know (such as worry more about plot than minor details). In fact as someone who has been writing creative stories for a decade I would have to be particualrly stupid to not know that. If you are going to be insulting rather than constructive then please don't respond to my posts. I don't appreciate patronizing commenmts.
Sorry, everyone else, about my ranting about my ranting and rathing.
Actually is it not possible to add things that improve things, yet are not in and of themselves that great? I was simply stating that my dmod would be better than a version of it without those details. You're right... I can't accurately predict it is better... which is why I don't think that.
Actually I was explaining why I said the oriiginal comment, not saying that method is set in stone.
Well if someone states an opnion that has reason and logic behind it I will seriously considered it but so far you have given me no explanations for your opinions so I cannot consider them properly and from all angels.
Actually I was saying that it will improve it, not that it would be a great improvement nor did I make any comments that implied it.
And, I, too am going off what other people have said in the past as I stated. Until now you did not. And from my experience people do eventually get sick of hearing about ANYTHING that is continually talked about but never released.
Really? SabreTrout often makes mean comments and based on the fact that he has files here that are now old, he is obviously no newbie. So just because I make a mean comment does not mean I am a newbie.
Well, actually I doubt everyone here has made dmods. And your comments are the only ones I have made these comments to. Which means there is little evidence that I don't listen since the other messages were ones of support from these same dmod authors you are talking about. I am not going to change something when I get more support than critism. Besides one statement of yours has influenced me. That is this: I am now going to worry about those fussy details at later stages so that my first alphas for my testers can be tested at earlier stages, thus speeding up the development stage since I don't have to correct them later on.
Oh and you have been constantly insulting my intelligence by making comments that include parts that I would have to be stupid to not know (such as worry more about plot than minor details). In fact as someone who has been writing creative stories for a decade I would have to be particualrly stupid to not know that. If you are going to be insulting rather than constructive then please don't respond to my posts. I don't appreciate patronizing commenmts.
Sorry, everyone else, about my ranting about my ranting and rathing.
