The Dink Network

Reply to The good, the bad, and the ugly

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 4th 2003, 11:00 AM
death.gif
Reviews
What are the qualifying factors to write one? What are the reasons behind writing a critique of a dmod? Are they meant to spur creativity or rein in the truly awful? Are there are unofficial guidelines to writing a review? If a review is bad and good, should the reviewer only state the good or sugar-coat the bad? Does a reviewer need to have made a dmod so s/he will know the difficulty of making one before s/he writes a review? Do reviews, good and bad, encourage or discourage new dmod authors? How far should a reviewer go in critising a review? Is the dmod author responsible for his finished product?

Perplexing questions and needful answers.

There are many of you out there who made dmods and might have felt shot down by certain aspects of a review. Did you take note of the criticisms with an eye to improving your next dmod or did you take the criticisms personally? Please be honest and give back to the reviewers some input so they can write better reviews.