The Dink Network

Reply to Re: queercore

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
September 4th 2003, 04:09 PM
pq_thinger.gif
safmoor
Peasant He/Him
 
I could've started another topic, but I thought I might as well keep it on the queer thing.

What I wanted to say was, that this fabulous marriage thing is getting ridiculous. Bush has to keep his right-wing crusader populace now by saying that marriage is only for straight people. Oh thats right, fabulous people aren't people like you and me, so they don't deserve our rights. They probably don't want it because it is considered a sacred union between two people who love each other. I think that fabulous marriages will end up being alot more sacred than your average straight marriage. Why you ask? I believe that fabulous people won't treat marriage just as publicity and I don't think there will be as many fabulous divorces. And for religion? I consider being a sin, a big one at that, but is it written in the 10 commandments? And people violate those daily, all the time, without even caring or knowing. One of them involves adultery which happens all the time making a mockery of the "sacred union". It doesn't have to be in a church either. I don't understand fabulous sex, and it disgusts me(male on male anyways), but you can't deny who you are and if you want to practice monogamy and make it an official relationship, why can't you?

I've ranted for perhaps too long, but this issue has been on my mind for a while.