The Dink Network

Reply to Re: Is there a name for Dink's world?

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
November 9th 2013, 03:31 PM
custom_skull.gif
Skull
Peasant He/Him Finland bloop
A Disembodied Sod 
Eh, there's no concrete proof. All we have is the oldest found skeleton and the newest found skeleton. For all we know, there might still be a dinosaur skeleton somewhere that's much older than any of the currently found ones. Same with the newer ones. For example, a long time it was "proven" that the humans originated from Africa, just because the oldest skeleton was found there. And then just a while back they found an even older skeleton in Europe (it was either in Denmark or Turkey. Can't remember which). So are we now going to assume humans originated from there? This kind of "hard evidence" is ridiculous. It's purely based on assumptions.

Sorry for the rant, but I can't stand when people state their "facts" and "reality" which idiot mainstream scientists and historians have force fed to them, instead of using common sense. Don't ignore the proof from the other side, such as the millions of depictions and records of dinosaurs before, during and after mediaeval times from all around the planet. It's no worse proof than a few fossils, which age I very much doubt can even be calculated as accurately as scientists claim. There's also the proof which I stated, that there are still dinosaurs living amongst us, in the form of crocodiles and turtles, for example. So they couldn't have died 66 million years ago, because they still exist today. Which means they also had to exist inbetween now and then.

/annoyed person over and out