Reply to Re: Crazy old Tim plays all the DMODs
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
This is one fantastic thread. Only today I had enough time to catch up with all these recaps, but it was well worth the time. 
I have trouble reviewing anything from before 2000 or so because I simply don't know to which standard I should hold them. DMODs released today seem to be, on average, of a very high standard, almost incomparible to the standard back in those days. I loved to hear some of those background stories on those early DMODs, makes me appreciate those efforts much more (and makes me understand the history of DMODs so much better).
If you manage to do all DMODs that would be a fantastic document for sure!
EDIT: Just as a clarification: While the average standard has gone up, this is mostly because there are much fewer bad DMODs, not because every DMOD nowadays is a classic such as POTA or something.
I have trouble reviewing anything from before 2000 or so because I simply don't know to which standard I should hold them. DMODs released today seem to be, on average, of a very high standard, almost incomparible to the standard back in those days. I loved to hear some of those background stories on those early DMODs, makes me appreciate those efforts much more (and makes me understand the history of DMODs so much better).
If you manage to do all DMODs that would be a fantastic document for sure!
EDIT: Just as a clarification: While the average standard has gone up, this is mostly because there are much fewer bad DMODs, not because every DMOD nowadays is a classic such as POTA or something.
