Reply to Re: My opinion on the school shootings in the US
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people. A gun is an inanimate object, it cannot, of it's own volition, kill another person. I could leave a pistol on my deck fully loaded and watch it. It will do nothing.
I, however, could pick up the gun and shoot someone. If my aim is true, then I can kill them. If not, I can wound them. I can also shoot the ground, or a target, and it will not kill someone.
Meh... you know what I meant. It's the middle of the night. I'm not gonna write an entire mythology from the point of the gun being built in the factory, to the point its bullet enters an innocent human being.
While I personally don't see the point of owning an army-grade weapon, beyond putting it up for display and never using it, the point...
You did not just say that... Wow, just wow. I'm speechless. xD
IS this not a debate?
Nope. It's you supporting the death of innocent children, while others are talking about how American gun laws suck.
While I do not reject the potential harm that guns can cause, I cannot ignore, as well, the potential harm that can come from other types of weaponry, such as knifes or bows and arrows.
I can look around a room and determine what can kill a person and how they can be killed by it. I could easily take a pen and stab someone in the throat with it, or take a textbook and bludgeon a person to death.
Yes you can. Hence why killings happen. Humans are crazy dinks. But you're not gonna shoot an entire school of children with a knife or a pen. You'd get most likely caught before you managed to kill anyone. Such as the school stabbings in China. The attacker barely managed to only hurt as many children, as the American with the gun killed during that same day. Plus he hurt many more.
And no, I didn't bother to reply to all the crap in your post, because arguing with you about American gun laws, or anything, is like arguing with a nerd about sitting in front of the computer.
I, however, could pick up the gun and shoot someone. If my aim is true, then I can kill them. If not, I can wound them. I can also shoot the ground, or a target, and it will not kill someone.
Meh... you know what I meant. It's the middle of the night. I'm not gonna write an entire mythology from the point of the gun being built in the factory, to the point its bullet enters an innocent human being.
While I personally don't see the point of owning an army-grade weapon, beyond putting it up for display and never using it, the point...
You did not just say that... Wow, just wow. I'm speechless. xD
IS this not a debate?
Nope. It's you supporting the death of innocent children, while others are talking about how American gun laws suck.
While I do not reject the potential harm that guns can cause, I cannot ignore, as well, the potential harm that can come from other types of weaponry, such as knifes or bows and arrows.
I can look around a room and determine what can kill a person and how they can be killed by it. I could easily take a pen and stab someone in the throat with it, or take a textbook and bludgeon a person to death.
Yes you can. Hence why killings happen. Humans are crazy dinks. But you're not gonna shoot an entire school of children with a knife or a pen. You'd get most likely caught before you managed to kill anyone. Such as the school stabbings in China. The attacker barely managed to only hurt as many children, as the American with the gun killed during that same day. Plus he hurt many more.
And no, I didn't bother to reply to all the crap in your post, because arguing with you about American gun laws, or anything, is like arguing with a nerd about sitting in front of the computer.
