Reply to Re: SARS
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Not likely. The danger of sars is from the panic created from the media hyper-inflamation of such a minor thing. Like really.
It isn't that big in the scheem of things. Probably, all the money spent by citizens on those near useless masks could have been spent on the the causes and eradication of sars right from the start and it would have been a much smaller threat.
Also, I think that the global total for sars cases is much less that 10k, so therefore less than 0.00017 percent of the worlds population have it.
Not to say that your concern is unwarented, its just that it could be better put to use in other ways *I* think
It isn't that big in the scheem of things. Probably, all the money spent by citizens on those near useless masks could have been spent on the the causes and eradication of sars right from the start and it would have been a much smaller threat.
Also, I think that the global total for sars cases is much less that 10k, so therefore less than 0.00017 percent of the worlds population have it.
Not to say that your concern is unwarented, its just that it could be better put to use in other ways *I* think
