Reply to Re: Red vs Blue: ULTIMATE SMACKDOWN!
If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Defining pink as girlish and blue as boyish is just not sexist. How is claiming girls are more likely to wear pink gender discrimination? No more so then saying most Europeans have pale skin. Stereotype? Check. Fact? Check. Derogative? Cross.
Whose fault is it that women, who have sexualised themselves since medieval days, are thought of in terms of flesh and passion (pink) while men who sailed the seas and flew through the skies and built law and architecture (blue).
In fact, this idea is as old as humans, wether evolved or created: women as providers of nurture, sex, gentleness, deviousness and weakness. Men as providers of shelter, strength, security, discipline, and impatience.
Modern society is pushing for androgeny and mediculturalism. The values of individuality and social hierachy are being forgotten, but when our world is a sterile wasteland of artificial peace and opression humanity will be the final massed-produced commodity without meaning or innate value.
Whose fault is it that women, who have sexualised themselves since medieval days, are thought of in terms of flesh and passion (pink) while men who sailed the seas and flew through the skies and built law and architecture (blue).
In fact, this idea is as old as humans, wether evolved or created: women as providers of nurture, sex, gentleness, deviousness and weakness. Men as providers of shelter, strength, security, discipline, and impatience.
Modern society is pushing for androgeny and mediculturalism. The values of individuality and social hierachy are being forgotten, but when our world is a sterile wasteland of artificial peace and opression humanity will be the final massed-produced commodity without meaning or innate value.
