The Dink Network

Reply to Re: v1.09?

If you don't have an account, just leave the password field blank.
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Antispam: Enter Dink Smallwood's last name (surname) below.
Formatting: :) :( ;( :P ;) :D >( : :s :O evil cat blood
Bold font Italic font hyperlink Code tags
Message:
 
 
August 3rd 2010, 11:56 AM
wizardb.gif
Kyle
Peasant He/Him Belgium
 
See, that's where I can't agree with you and where my problem (wouldn't call it that, it's not a big deal and I didn't want to make it sound like a huge issue to me xD), I don't think the poll options represent the full range of options available and makes it sound like we might as well delete old d-mods from the site when a new version of Dink would be created.

First option reads as: If it doesn't have backwards compatibility, I won't care about the new Dink, I need it, because... well... I need it since running 2 Dinks is too hard

Second option reads: I'd really like that in so I can still play older d-mods But I guess I'd still rather have some new features over backwards compatibility.

Third option reads: Would be nice, don't really care either way if I can still play older d-mods, done with those anyway.

Fourth option reads: Why would I want backwards compatibility? Does anyone still want to play those old and decrepit d-mods? It's okay that those will be left in the dust and become unplayable for all eternity.

Fifth option reads: BANANA! Yum

I'm not saying everyone will read it like that, but I'm pretty sure people who DIDN'T read this topic or went along with the discussion will walk away with that impression and vote accordingly

EDIT: if a "new version of Dink" is supposed to imply a regular upgrade everyone goes through and not a seperate engine, then of course the poll is very valid and I would vote for the first option